100/ 100
A
OverallA96/100
Natracare Organic Cotton Super Plus Tampons

Natracare · Tampons

Natracare Organic Cotton Super Plus Tampons

A · Very low PFAS

Lower concern, organic cotton tampon with third-party organic certification; no PFAS-prone coatings typical in category.

Verdict: BuyOrganic cotton core with cardboard applicator and third-party organic certification eliminates most chemical hazard pathways typical in tampon category.

Natracare's Super Plus tampons are made from certified organic cotton and cardboard, materials not inherently associated with PFAS. The brand holds MADE SAFE certification, which screens for harmful chemicals. No evidence of water-resistant or non-stick treatments that would require PFAS.

GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)MADE SAFE Certified
Shop Natracare on Amazon →

Material

Organic cotton core; cardboard applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Third-party PFAS-free verification

Independently verified PFAS-free by a third party.

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Natracare Super Plus uses certified organic cotton as its core absorbent material, which means it was grown without synthetic pesticides, herbicides, or GMO seeds. The cardboard applicator replaces plastic, eliminating concerns around BPA, phthalates, and microplastic shedding during insertion. Organic certification requires third-party audit of the supply chain, reducing the likelihood of synthetic dyes, bleach residues, or unlisted chemical treatments applied post-harvest.

The brand's record and disclosure

Natracare has published ingredient lists and holds certifications from GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) and FSC (Forest Stewardship Council), indicating transparency on material sourcing. The brand has not faced major product safety recalls or regulatory enforcement actions on public record. However, the brand does not prominently disclose testing for residual pesticides or heavy metals in the final product, so independent verification of contamination limits is not readily available to consumers.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional tampons use rayon and cotton blends, often bleached with chlorine and treated with synthetic slip agents or antimicrobial coatings that can introduce dioxins or residual chemical exposure. Natracare's organic-only, plastic-free design is positioned at the safer end of the market for chemical burden. Some competitors (e.g., Seventh Generation, Cora) offer similar organic certification; Natracare distinguishes itself with the cardboard applicator, which avoids plastic-leaching altogether.

If you buy it

No special storage or handling precautions are required beyond keeping the product dry and in its original packaging until use. The cardboard applicator may absorb moisture in very humid environments; store in a cool, dry place. Use as directed (follow tampon insertion safety guidelines to avoid toxic shock syndrome risk, which applies to all tampon brands equally). Replace the product per standard recommendations (every 4-8 hours depending on flow); organic material does not change this timeline.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Pesticide residues in organic cotton

Organic certification prohibits synthetic pesticide use during growth, but independent testing data on residual pesticide levels in the finished Natracare product is not publicly available. Certification oversight reduces but does not eliminate theoretical contamination risk.

None known

Dioxins and chlorine bleach byproducts

Natracare does not disclose its bleaching process for cotton. Organic cotton may use alternative bleaching methods (e.g., hydrogen peroxide or oxygen-based), but specific process details are not published; no recalls or complaints on record.

None known

Synthetic dyes or colorants

Organic certification restricts synthetic azo dyes and heavy-metal-based pigments. No public disclosure of dye testing or heavy metal limits in the product itself, but certification standards require compliance.

Possible

Cardboard applicator breakdown and microparticles

Cardboard applicators may shed fibers or degrade if exposed to moisture during use or storage. This is not a chemical hazard but a physical one; long-term vaginal irritation from fiber fragments is not well-studied in literature.

None known

Adhesive or binder residues in cardboard applicator

Cardboard is typically bonded with food-grade or pharmaceutical-grade adhesives; Natracare does not specify the adhesive formulation. No public data on leaching or irritant potential from the applicator adhesive.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More tampons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.