75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
NARS Line & Shine Lip Duo

NARS · Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

NARS Line & Shine Lip Duo

C · Moderate

Lower-concern cosmetic; NARS has not disclosed PFAS use in lip products, and formulae typically rely on conventional pigments and waxes.

Verdict: BuyStandard cosmetic lip product with no established safety recalls; NARS lacks PFAS transparency but formulation relies on conventional pigments and waxes typical of the category.

NARS Line & Shine Lip Duo contains no known PFAS-prone ingredients based on publicly available product information. Lip cosmetics rarely require waterproofing treatments or Teflon-family coating coatings.

Shop NARS on Amazon →

Material

pigments, oils, waxes, emollients (standard cosmetic base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

NARS Line & Shine Lip Duo combines a lip liner and lip gloss in one product. Both components use conventional cosmetic pigments (iron oxides, carmine, titanium dioxide), natural and synthetic waxes (beeswax, candelilla wax, synthetic wax esters), and emollient oils (jojoba, argan, mineral oil derivatives). These materials are standard across mass-market lip products and have long safety histories in cosmetics; the formulation does not rely on novel synthetics or high-hazard additives.

The brand's record and disclosure

NARS does not publicly disclose PFAS use or absence in its lip products, and no independent testing or regulatory action has flagged NARS cosmetics for PFAS contamination. The brand complies with FDA and EU cosmetic regulations but does not exceed them with third-party certifications (e.g., no cruelty-free or clean beauty seals). No major safety recalls have been issued for this product line.

How it compares in its category

NARS lip products sit in the mainstream luxury cosmetics segment, formulated comparably to competitors like MAC, Charlotte Tilbury, and Sephora house brands. Unlike some indie or 'clean beauty' brands, NARS does not advertise synthetic-free or PFAS-free claims; it relies instead on regulatory compliance and brand reputation. The dual format (liner + gloss) is common in the category and does not introduce unique material risks.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent wax softening or pigment degradation. Lip products are low-risk because ingestion risk is minimal (small amounts are swallowed naturally) and dermal exposure is brief. Replace every 1-2 years or if the product discolors, separates, or develops an off odor. No special handling or maintenance is required.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Heavy metals in pigments

NARS uses FDA-approved pigments (iron oxides, carmine); no recalls or testing have reported lead, cadmium, or arsenic in this product. Iron oxides are considered safe at cosmetic concentrations.

Possible

Fragrance allergens

NARS lip products may contain fragrance compounds; the full fragrance blend is not disclosed on packaging. Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or consult ingredient lists for specific allergens.

None known

1,4-dioxane contamination

No testing or recalls have identified 1,4-dioxane (a probable carcinogen found in some cosmetic emulsifiers) in NARS lip products. Risk is low in wax-based lip formulations that avoid PEG emulsifiers.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers

Lip gloss and liner formulations do not typically use formaldehyde-releasing preservatives; NARS products comply with EU and FDA restrictions on this class.

Possible

Mineral oil and petrolatum occlusion concerns

If this product contains mineral oil or petrolatum (common emollients), some dermatologists advise caution for frequent use on sensitive lips, though regulatory bodies classify these as safe. Discontinue if irritation occurs.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Oil base (likely mineral, plant, or synthetic esters); glass or plastic container

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for typical lip oil; no waterproof treatment triggers detected.

Risky category by default

tarte Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Tarte

Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Glass container with cosmetic liquid formula (oils, silicones, pigments)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern, glass lip plump is a straightforward cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Armani Beauty Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Armani Beauty

Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Glass container; proprietary gloss formula (undisclosed composition)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; glass packaging itself is PFAS-safe, but gloss formula composition remains undisclosed.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

More lip gloss & lip balm grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.