20/ 100
F

PFAS score

MSR Access 2 Ski Touring 2-Person 4-Season Tent

MSR (Mountain Safety Research) · Tents

MSR Access 2 Ski Touring 2-Person 4-Season Tent

F · High PFAS

Skip until MSR discloses water-repellent coating chemistry; waterproofing coatings are a common PFAS vector.

MSR's Access 2 tent uses ripstop nylon with a water-repellent treatment, but the company does not publicly disclose whether that water-repellent coating contains PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ripstop nylon with unspecified water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 42% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Tents

6-Person Khaki Waterproof Windproof Easy Setup, Double Layer Family Camping Tent with 1 Mesh Door & 5 Large Mesh Windows

Khyam

6-Person Khaki Waterproof Windproof Easy Setup, Double Layer Family Camping Tent with 1 Mesh Door & 5 Large Mesh Windows

Polyester fabric with unspecified waterproof/windproof coating

F
F · High PFAS

Skip until brand discloses waterproofing chemistry.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More tents grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.