Mountainsmith · Portable Outdoor Gear Bags
Mountainsmith Backpack Rain Cover
Waterproof coating type unknown. Skip unless Mountainsmith discloses.
Rain covers require water-repellent treatment, typically water-repellent coating-coated. Mountainsmith does not disclose coating chemistry or PFAS status, raising uncertainty for this functional product.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
synthetic fabric with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating, composition unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Mountainsmith rain covers are synthetic fabric (typically polyester or nylon) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. The water-repellent coating is the critical component: historically, many outdoor brands used PFAS-based water repellents, though some have switched to non-PFAS alternatives. Without Mountainsmith's explicit disclosure of the coating chemistry, the specific hazard profile cannot be determined. The base synthetic fabric itself poses minimal leaching risk since rain covers are not ingested and contact is external and brief.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mountainsmith has not published transparent information about water-repellent coating chemistry or PFAS avoidance commitments in publicly available materials. The brand does not appear to have faced major recalls or regulatory actions related to water-repellent coatings. This silence is notable given that many competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, even some budget brands) have begun disclosing non-PFAS or PFAS-free coating commitments. Without documentation, it is unclear whether this product uses legacy PFAS chemistry or newer alternatives.
How it compares in its category
Rain covers are a low-hazard category compared to items like cookware or cosmetics because they are worn externally and not ingested or applied to skin. However, they are often stored in damp conditions and transported with food or gear, creating indirect contamination risk if PFAS or other coating particles shed into water or foodstuffs. Premium outdoor brands increasingly market PFAS-free water-repellent coating; Mountainsmith's lack of such marketing suggests either reliance on traditional chemistry or indifference to consumer transparency. Price-point alternatives from major retailers offer comparable rain-cover function without clarity on coatings either, so this product is not uniquely positioned.
If you buy it
Store the rain cover dry and in open air to minimize off-gassing of any coating residues. Do not wash it with hot water or harsh detergents, as these can degrade the water-repellent coating layer and potentially mobilize coating chemicals. Rinse gently with cool water if needed; allow air-dry only. Replace the cover if the water-repellent finish visibly breaks down (beading stops, water soaks through), as an aging coating may shed particles. Before purchase, contact Mountainsmith directly to confirm water-repellent coating type; if they decline to answer, treat the PFAS risk as unmitigated.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
water-repellent coating degradation and particle shedding
Rain covers experience mechanical wear and UV exposure over time; as the water-repellent coating breaks down, particles may shed into stored gear, water, or food. If the coating contains PFAS or other fluorinated compounds, shedding poses indirect ingestion risk.
Formaldehyde resins in synthetic fabric
Mountainsmith rain covers have no documented formaldehyde-resin treatment. Synthetic base fabrics (polyester, nylon) do not typically require formaldehyde dyes or finishes for rain covers, so this is not a established concern for this product class.
Azo dyes in colored synthetic fabrics
Mountainsmith does not publicly disclose dye chemistry for rain covers. Azo dye use in outdoor gear is not documented as a widespread problem, and external brief-contact use poses minimal absorption risk compared to apparel worn directly on skin.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating off-gassing
water-repellent coating coatings can off-gas during storage and initial use, particularly in warm conditions. The type and volume of VOCs depend on coating chemistry; this is unquantified for Mountainsmith products.
Antimony in polyester material
Polyester rain covers may theoretically contain antimony as a catalyst residue, but external contact is minimal and no known issues have been reported for this product or brand.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Portable Outdoor Gear Bags
REI Co-op
Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L
Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned
Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.
⚠Risky category by default
More portable outdoor gear bags grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.