20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Mountainsmith Apex 80 Backpack

Mountainsmith · Portable Outdoor Gear Bags

Mountainsmith Apex 80 Backpack

F · High PFAS

High-end backpack likely uses water-repellent coating treatment; PFAS risk unclear, no brand disclosure.

Verdict: SkipDurable nylon pack with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry; no major hazards on record, but PFAS disclosure gap and lack of third-party testing warrant cautious selection.

Mountainsmith does not publicly disclose PFAS in the Apex 80. Premium hiking packs typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, but no lab data or brand statement available for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon fabric with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Apex 80 uses nylon fabric, a synthetic polymer derived from petroleum, treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to shed moisture. Nylon itself is chemically stable and does not leach under normal use conditions. The water-repellent coating finish is the material concern: many water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFOA or other fluorochemicals to function, though reformulated alternatives now exist. Without Mountainsmith's disclosure of their specific water-repellent coating chemistry, the true composition remains opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mountainsmith has not published a public statement on PFAS use, chemical transparency, or third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) in their product line. The company does not appear in major chemical disclosure databases or sustainability reports. This silence does not confirm PFAS use, but it signals a lack of proactive transparency typical of outdoor brands facing consumer scrutiny on fluorochemical content.

How it compares in its category

Mid-to-high-end nylon backpacks occupy a crowded market; many competitors (e.g., Osprey, Patagonia, Gregory) now specify fluorine-free or low-impact water-repellent coating systems in their product descriptions. Mountainsmith's Apex line does not; this gap places it behind category leaders on chemical disclosure, though the absence of a statement does not guarantee conventional PFAS treatment. Price point and durability are competitive; chemical transparency is not.

If you buy it

Wash the pack in cool water with mild soap; avoid dry cleaning, which can concentrate residues. Store in a dry location to minimize mold growth and the need for re-treatment. Nylon is durable but will degrade slowly over years of UV exposure and heavy abrasion; replacement is typically warranted after 5-10 years of heavy use. If water repellency fades, commercial nylon water-repellent coating refresh kits are available; test on a hidden seam first to avoid stiffening.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating fluorochemical residue (PFAS-related but assessed separately)

Mountainsmith does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Nylon water-repellent coating coatings commonly use fluorinated compounds; reformulated non-fluorine options are commercially available but not confirmed in this product.

None known

Azo dyes in nylon or trim

No recalls or reports of azo dye contamination in Mountainsmith packs. Nylon fabric typically dyed with regulated colorants, but third-party testing is not publicly available.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing resins

Nylon itself does not require formaldehyde-based finishes; no evidence of these substances in outdoor nylon packs of this type.

None known

Heavy metals in stitching or hardware

Zippers and grommets on outdoor packs may contain trace metals, but mainstream brands typically use zinc or aluminum alloys that meet consumer safety limits. No specific safety alerts on record for Mountainsmith hardware.

Possible

Microfiber shedding during washing

Nylon fabric sheds microfibers when washed, especially with synthetic water-repellent coating coatings. This is a general concern for all synthetic textiles; use a wash bag or rinse cycle filter to reduce environmental discharge.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Portable Outdoor Gear Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Risky category by default

More portable outdoor gear bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.