40/ 100
F
OverallF10/100
Mophie Juice Pack Air Smartphone Case

Mophie · Waterproof Personal Electronics

Mophie Juice Pack Air Smartphone Case

F · High PFAS

Brand silent on PFAS; waterproof coating composition undisclosed. Higher caution warranted.

Verdict: SkipPolycarbonate case with undisclosed water-resistant coating presents PFAS uncertainty and typical polymer leaching risks; manageable with informed use.

Mophie does not disclose PFAS status or coating chemistry for this battery case. Waterproofing typically raises PFAS risk, though specific formula unknown. Recommend contacting brand directly.

The safe swap

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

Pelican M40 Micro Case

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polycarbonate shell, likely water-resistant coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Mophie Juice Pack Air uses a polycarbonate shell, a rigid thermoplastic chosen for impact resistance and slim profile. Polycarbonate itself does not contain BPA in typical modern formulations, but the unspecified water-resistant coating is the concern: such coatings commonly rely on fluorinated compounds (including PFAS-class substances) to achieve water and oil repellency. The actual composition of Mophie's coating is not publicly disclosed, creating uncertainty about what you are handling and potentially transferring to skin or food contact surfaces.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mophie (owned by Zagg, now a subsidiary of GN Store Nord) does not publish material safety data sheets, chemical composition disclosures, or PFAS policies for this product line. The brand has not signed onto the ZDHC (Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals) gateway or similar transparency initiatives. No independent recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this specific model, but silence on coating chemistry is a red flag for consumer transparency.

How it compares in its category

Smartphone cases vary widely in coating strategy. This polycarbonate-based design with sealed water resistance sits in the mid-tier for chemical disclosure; many budget cases omit water coatings entirely (reducing PFAS risk), while premium cases often still lack full transparency. Competitors like Spigen and OtterBox publish more material information, though even they are not uniform on fluorinated coatings in their protective cases.

If you buy it

Minimize skin contact with the exterior surface, especially if you have sensitive skin or apply it to children's devices. Do not deliberately heat the case or expose it to prolonged direct sunlight, which can degrade the polycarbonate and potentially compromise the coating seal. Wash hands after extended handling. Replace the case if the outer coating visibly cracks, peels, or wears away, as this signals breakdown of the protective barrier. Store in a cool, dry place away from chemical solvents.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in water-resistant coating

Undisclosed water-repellent finish on polycarbonate shell almost certainly contains fluorinated compounds; specific PFAS identity and migration risk unknown due to lack of manufacturer disclosure.

Possible

Polycarbonate leaching under stress

Modern polycarbonate rarely leaches BPA, but prolonged heat exposure (e.g., in hot vehicles or near heat sources) or scratches/cracks can potentially release trace monomers; risk is low under normal use.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

As the water-resistant finish ages or chips, microscopic particles of the coating may shed into skin contact or onto the phone; composition unknown makes risk assessment difficult.

Possible

Dermal irritation from coating contact

Some users report skin sensitivity to protective case coatings; reactions are typically mild and caused by fluorinated or silicone-based additives, though incidence is uncommon.

None known

Off-gassing during manufacture or storage

No reports of VOC or odor issues from this specific product, though new polycarbonate cases can emit faint plastic odors that dissipate within days.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Personal Electronics

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

M40 Micro Case

Polypropylene copolymer plastic case with solid construction, no Teflon-family coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern. Rigid PP case with no waterproofing treatment.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and metal alloy components

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. TPU phone case has minimal PFAS risk profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

TPU polymer, impact-resistant composite

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, but no PFAS transparency from UAG.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof personal electronics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.