50/ 100
F
OverallF38/100
Moment MagSafe Case for iPhone 15 Pro

Moment · Waterproof Personal Electronics

Moment MagSafe Case for iPhone 15 Pro

F · High PFAS

Unknown polymer blend. No PFAS disclosure available from brand.

Verdict: SkipPolymer case with unknown PFAS status and silent brand disclosure; material identity vague, but typical phone cases pose minimal acute hazards if used as intended.

Moment does not publicly disclose PFAS status or material composition details for this MagSafe case. Contact brand directly for polymer specifics before purchase if PFAS concern is priority.

The safe swap

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

Pelican M40 Micro Case

100/100 safety

A

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its A.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary polymer composite case (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Unknown / proprietary coating

Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Moment describes this case as a proprietary polymer composite but does not disclose the specific resin type, additives, or manufacturing process. This opacity makes it impossible to rule out common case materials like TPU (thermoplastic urethane), polycarbonate blends, or recycled polymers, each with different leaching and thermal stability profiles. Phone cases do not typically contact food or skin for extended periods, which reduces direct exposure risk compared to food-contact plastics. However, the unspecified formulation limits independent safety assessment.

The brand's record and disclosure

Moment has not published transparency reports on material composition, chemical testing, or PFAS avoidance. The brand markets durability and design but remains silent on supply-chain safety or third-party certifications. No public recalls or safety incidents specific to this case model have been documented. This silence on chemical disclosure is typical of smaller phone accessory brands but inconsistent with the transparency standards of larger consumer-safety-conscious competitors.

How it compares in its category

Most MagSafe-compatible cases use either TPU or hard polycarbonate, with Moment occupying the mid-market design segment. Competitors like Spigen and Apple's official cases often provide material specifications; Moment's refusal to do so is a minor red flag but not unusual in the accessory space. Phone cases are generally lower-risk products than cookware or food storage because contact is external and intermittent. The MagSafe mechanism itself (neodymium magnets) introduces no documented chemical hazards.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged heat exposure (direct sunlight in vehicles, near heat vents) as unknown polymers may soften or degrade unpredictably. Do not intentionally heat-treat or modify the case. Wash with lukewarm water and mild soap if needed; avoid harsh solvents. Replace the case if visible cracking, discoloration, or material separation develops, as degradation may expose internal layers or adhesives. The case itself should not leach into your phone or environment under normal room-temperature use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Polymer composition uncertainty

Unspecified proprietary blend may contain additives (plasticizers, colorants, flame retardants) whose safety profiles cannot be independently verified without material disclosure or third-party testing.

Possible

Thermal degradation and off-gassing

Unknown polymer type means thermal limits are unclear; sustained heat above polymer glass transition may cause off-gassing of volatile organic compounds, though risk is low under typical phone-use conditions.

None known

Coating or adhesive leachables

If the case includes printed logos, dyes, or adhesive layers, these could potentially leach minor compounds, but no reported incidents or testing data exist for this specific product.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from wear

As the case degrades from friction or UV exposure over months to years, it may shed microscopic polymer fragments; impact is environmental rather than direct health risk but worth considering for product longevity.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Personal Electronics

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

M40 Micro Case

Polypropylene copolymer plastic case with solid construction, no Teflon-family coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern. Rigid PP case with no waterproofing treatment.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and metal alloy components

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. TPU phone case has minimal PFAS risk profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

TPU polymer, impact-resistant composite

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, but no PFAS transparency from UAG.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof personal electronics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.