55/ 100
F
OverallF47/100
Mira Insulated Wall Vacuum Stainless Steel Water Bottle Tumbler 17oz

Mira · Insulated Travel Drinkware

Mira Insulated Wall Vacuum Stainless Steel Water Bottle Tumbler 17oz

F · High PFAS

Lower concern. Bare stainless steel tumbler with no reported PFAS risk.

Verdict: SkipStainless steel construction eliminates most leaching risks; no PFAS concerns or established safety recalls found.

Vacuum-insulated stainless steel water bottle with no known Teflon-family coating coatings or nonstick surfaces. MIRA does not disclose PFAS information, but the core material presents lower PFAS concern.

The safe swap

Ember Cold Tumbler

Ember

Ember Cold Tumbler

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel interior, vacuum-insulated double-wall construction

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Stain-resistant finish

Stain-resistant finishes are a common PFAS use.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tumbler uses 18/8 food-grade stainless steel (18% chromium, 8% nickel) for the interior and vacuum-insulated double-wall construction with an air gap between layers. Stainless steel is chemically inert when properly manufactured and does not leach metal ions into beverages under normal use. The lid and any seals are the potential weak points for off-gassing or leachables, but stainless steel itself poses negligible risk of cadmium, lead, or aluminum leaching.

The brand's record and disclosure

MIRA does not publish detailed material sourcing or third-party safety certifications on their website. The brand has not publicly disclosed PFAS testing or manufacturing standards, though no recalls or safety complaints are on record for this specific tumbler model. MIRA operates in a crowded drinkware category with minimal transparency; lack of proactive disclosure does not indicate a problem but suggests limited consumer accountability infrastructure.

How it compares in its category

Insulated stainless steel tumblers are considered one of the safest drinkware options because the material does not require chemical coatings or liners prone to degradation. This product is comparable to higher-priced brands like Hydro Flask or YETI in core material safety; the main differentiator is warranty and build quality, not hazard profile. Plastic-lined or ceramic-coated alternatives carry higher leaching risk.

If you buy it

Hand wash the lid and silicone gasket separately to prevent mold or bacterial growth in tight seams; dishwasher is typically safe for the steel body. Avoid leaving acidic beverages (citrus, vinegar) sitting for extended periods, as even stainless steel can develop minor corrosion over years if the protective oxide layer is compromised. Replace the lid gasket if it cracks or discolors. The vacuum seal will gradually weaken over 2-5 years; this is normal wear, not a safety issue.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Lid/gasket material degradation or off-gassing

The lid is not specified as stainless steel and likely contains plastic or rubber. Silicone gaskets can off-gas volatile compounds at high temperatures or degrade over time, though risk is low with intermittent use.

None known

Nickel leaching (from stainless steel)

18/8 stainless steel releases negligible nickel under normal beverage contact. Leaching only becomes a concern with prolonged acidic liquid storage or damage to the steel surface.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth in seams

The vacuum seal and lid gasket create narrow spaces where bacteria or mold can grow if not dried thoroughly after washing. This is a use and maintenance issue, not a manufacturing defect.

None known

Coating breakdown on exterior

No external coating is mentioned; if the exterior finish is painted or powder-coated, it could degrade over time, but this does not affect liquid contact surfaces.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Insulated Travel Drinkware

Ember Cold Tumbler

Ember

Cold Tumbler

stainless steel with silicone seal

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; stainless steel tumbler unlikely to contain PFAS.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Ember Tumblers - Set of 4

Ember

Tumblers - Set of 4

Stainless steel double-wall insulated

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; stainless steel drinkware rarely treated.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Ember Cup 14 oz Slate Black

Ember

Cup 14 oz Slate Black

Ceramic or ceramic-coated stainless steel with heated base

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Smart cup uses ceramic coating, not Teflon-type coating nonstick.

Naturally PFAS-free material

More insulated travel drinkware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.