75/ 100
C
OverallF61/100
Mielle Pomegranate & Honey Moisturizing Detangling Shampoo

Mielle Organics · Shampoo

Mielle Pomegranate & Honey Moisturizing Detangling Shampoo

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, liquid shampoos lack typical PFAS-prone applications, but silent brand disclosure.

Verdict: BuyWater-based shampoo with organic positioning, no established safety recalls or heavy-metal contamination reports; lower hazard profile typical of liquid personal care.

Mielle Organics does not disclose PFAS policies for this shampoo. Liquid rinse-off cosmetics like shampoos are lower-risk products for PFAS contamination compared to waterproof or stain-resistant cosmetics. No independent lab testing or third-party PFAS verification is publicly available for this product.

Shop Mielle Organics on Amazon →

Material

water-based shampoo formulation, organic plant extracts

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Mielle Pomegranate & Honey is a water-based liquid shampoo formulated with plant extracts (pomegranate, honey) and surfactants. Liquid shampoos lack the ceramic-glaze and mineral-coating hazards of solid products, and plant-extract inclusion does not inherently create safety risks if preservatives and surfactants meet cosmetic regulations. The water-soluble matrix means no microplastic shedding or leaching from polymer coatings during use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mielle Organics emphasizes organic and natural positioning but maintains silence on detailed ingredient safety or third-party testing disclosures. No major recalls or formulation controversies are on record for this product line. The brand does not voluntarily publish PFAS test results or heavy-metal screening data, which is typical of mid-tier personal care brands but limits transparency.

How it compares in its category

Liquid shampoos generally carry lower inherent hazard burden than bar soaps with colorants or solid care products with mineral fillers. Mielle's organic marketing aligns with consumer expectations for reduced synthetic fragrance allergens and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, though 'organic' certification alone does not guarantee absence of irritants or sensitizers. Comparable brands (SheaMoisture, Carol's Daughter) operate under similar disclosure opacity.

If you buy it

Use as directed; no special storage or heat precautions apply to liquid shampoo. Discontinue if scalp irritation, rash, or eye irritation occurs, as plant extracts and fragrances can trigger sensitivities in susceptible individuals. Standard shelf life is 12-24 months unopened; discard if product separates, odor changes, or mold appears in the bottle. No maintenance or replacement triggers beyond normal depletion.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

Liquid shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylated surfactant manufacture. No recall or specific testing for this product is on record, but the hazard class applies to water-based personal care formulations generally.

Reported

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

The product lists 'fragrance' and plant extracts; fragrance compounds are not required to be individually named on cosmetic labels in the US. Pomegranate and honey extracts are low-risk, but fragrance blends can contain contact allergens or sensitizers in some consumer populations.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No specific test results or regulatory findings document formaldehyde-releasers in Mielle Pomegranate & Honey. Organic positioning suggests avoidance, but ingredient transparency is not publicly available to confirm.

None known

Heavy metals in botanical extracts or pigments

Plant-based shampoos may accumulate trace metals from agricultural or processing sources. No recalls or contamination reports for Mielle products are established; botanical ingredients in this formulation are cosmetically safe-listed.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Liquid shampoo formulations do not shed microplastics during use. Solid bar shampoos or exfoliating products pose this risk; Mielle's liquid form avoids the hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 75% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.