Method · Hand Soap
METHOD Foaming Hand Wash
Lower concern for PFAS, but Method does not disclose PFAS avoidance, verify ingredients if concerned.
METHOD Foaming Hand Wash is a water-based liquid cosmetic with no known Teflon-type coating, Teflon-family coating, or water/stain repellent coatings that would trigger PFAS use. The brand has not made public PFAS-free claims or pursued third-party verification.
Shop Method on Amazon →Material
aqueous foaming liquid surfactant blend
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Method Foaming Hand Wash is an aqueous liquid formulation based on plant-derived and synthetic surfactants designed to create lather without requiring high water volume. The product relies on detergent chemistry (surfactants that reduce surface tension) rather than abrasives or harsh solvents, which generally poses lower acute toxicity risk than traditional soaps. Foaming formulations are intentionally diluted, meaning active ingredients are lower in concentration than gel or bar alternatives, reducing exposure per wash.
The brand's record and disclosure
Method is owned by SC Johnson and has positioned itself as a sustainability-focused brand with transparency initiatives; however, the company does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance or provide detailed ingredient sourcing for all formulations. The brand has no major product recalls or regulatory actions on record for hand soap. Method products carry certifications from third parties such as Leaping Bunny (cruelty-free) and some SKUs carry EWG verification, though not all formulations are independently tested for contaminants.
How it compares in its category
Foaming hand soaps as a category have a lower chemical hazard profile than antibacterial soaps (which may contain triclosan or triclocarban) or heavily fragranced specialty soaps. Method's formulations are typical for mainstream foaming hand wash and sit mid-range for transparency; they avoid known problematic additives like hexachlorophene but do not disclose microbead content (though foaming products rarely contain them). Compared to bar soaps or liquid concentrates, foaming formulations use more water and packaging but offer comparable or lower contamination risk during use.
If you buy it
Use the product as directed (dime-sized amount per wash, rinse thoroughly). Store away from direct heat and sunlight to preserve surfactant stability and prevent ingredient degradation over time. Check the dispenser mechanism periodically for bacterial biofilm buildup in the pump valve, especially in humid bathrooms; rinse the pump head with clean water weekly if foam decreases. Replace the bottle when empty rather than refilling with other products, as method-specific pumps are designed for their formulation viscosity.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens
Method hand soaps typically contain fragrance blends; while the brand does not disclose full fragrance ingredients (industry standard due to proprietary formulations), some individuals report contact sensitization to fragranced hand soaps. No product-specific allergic reaction recalls are on record.
Surfactant skin irritation (acute)
Foaming hand wash concentrations are lower than gels, reducing irritation risk; however, overuse or use on compromised skin can cause dryness or irritation typical of any detergent product. This is usage-dependent rather than a formulation defect.
Preservative sensitivity
Aqueous foaming formulations require preservatives to prevent microbial growth; Method uses food-grade preservatives such as methylisothiazolinone in some SKUs, which has triggered contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals in rare cases. Preservative disclosure is listed on packaging.
Microplastic shedding from dispenser
Method foaming soap pumps are plastic housing, but the product itself does not intentionally contain microbeads. Pump degradation over years of use could theoretically shed micro-particles, but this is not specific to Method and is not established as a safety concern for hand soap dispensers.
1,4-Dioxane residual contamination
Dioxane is a surfactant manufacturing byproduct found in some cosmetic and personal care products. No testing or disclosure from Method indicates presence or absence in this hand soap; SC Johnson has not published independent dioxane testing for hand soap lines.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Hand Soap
Ecos
Orange Hand Soap
Plant-based surfactants, water, essential oils (orange)
Lower concern, solid plant-based formula with credible third-party oversight; no PFAS-prone materials.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Seventh Generation
Hand Wash, Free Clean
aqueous surfactants, botanicals, water-based formula
Lower PFAS concern; buy with confidence if skin-sensitivity is a priority.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Seventh Generation
Liquid Hand Soap Free & Clean
Water-based liquid soap formulation
Lower-concern choice; no PFAS expected in liquid soap format, but verification limited to brand claims.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More hand soap grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.