85/ 100
B
OverallC73/100
METHOD All Purpose Cleaning Wipes

Method · Cleaning Wipes

METHOD All Purpose Cleaning Wipes

B · Low PFAS

Lower PFAS concern; basic wipe with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-guard treatment.

Verdict: BuyMethod wipes use basic polypropylene with no disclosed water-repellent coatings; low chemical hazard profile and established brand transparency make this a safer cleaning wipe choice.

Method All Purpose Cleaning Wipes are made from nonwoven materials (typically polypropylene) without disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant coatings, the main PFAS risk factors for wipes. Method does not claim PFAS-free status, nor disclose any fluorochemical treatments.

Shop Method on Amazon →

Material

nonwoven polypropylene blend, no water/stain repellent coating disclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Method All Purpose Cleaning Wipes are constructed from a nonwoven polypropylene blend without disclosed water or stain-repellent surface treatments. This matters because polypropylene is a thermoplastic with relatively low leaching risk at room temperature and during normal wiping use. The absence of a fluorochemical water-guard coating (which would introduce PFAS) reduces exposure to persistent compounds during storage and use. Nonwoven polypropylene itself does not require formaldehyde resins or heavy-metal pigments in its base production, lowering inherent chemical complexity.

The brand's record and disclosure

Method is owned by SC Johnson and has published voluntary sustainability commitments and ingredient transparency policies, including public ingredient lists for cleaning formulas (though the wipe substrate itself receives less detailed disclosure). The brand has not faced major recalls or safety controversies specific to wipe products in the United States. Method's parent company has faced historical scrutiny over PFAS use in other product lines, but Method's public stance on the wipes category remains silent; no PFAS-containing treatments are known to be disclosed or confirmed in this product. Absence of claims (water-resistant, stain-guard) on the packaging is a positive signal that fluorochemical treatments were likely not applied.

How it compares in its category

Most disposable cleaning wipes on the market fall into two tiers: basic wipes (like this one) with minimal coating, and premium or marketed-as-durable wipes that often include PFAS-based water repellency or proprietary antimicrobial treatments. Method positions itself in the basic-to-mid segment with emphasis on plant-derived cleaning agents rather than substrate innovation, which means fewer chemical additives compared to marketed alternatives like Clorox or Lysol wipes. The lack of advertised durability or water repellency is typical for a budget-conscious, eco-conscious brand and correlates with simpler chemistry. Compared to reusable microfiber cloths, disposable wipes trade environmental burden for convenience and lower contamination risk in multi-user settings.

If you buy it

Store wipes in a cool, dry location (below 80F) to prevent polypropylene degradation and premature drying of the cleaning liquid inside the package. Use straight from the package without additional water; the cleaning formula is formulated for the wipe's moisture content. Do not expose to direct sunlight for extended periods, as UV light can degrade polypropylene over time. Discard after use; these wipes are not designed for reuse and may harbor bacteria if rinsed and stored wet. If the package dries out before use, the wipes will lose efficacy but pose no chemical hazard.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Microplastic generation during use and disposal

Nonwoven polypropylene breaks down into small fibers during mechanical wiping and in landfill/wastewater. Method has not published data on fiber shedding rates for this specific product; degradation is inherent to the material class but quantity and environmental impact remain unquantified.

None known

Cleaning formula ingredients (not substrate-related)

Method publishes ingredient lists for its cleaning formulas and uses plant-derived surfactants in most lines. No known hazardous substance recalls (e.g., formaldehyde, phthalates) apply to the cleaning liquid itself; however, this assessment covers the wipe substrate only, not the chemical formulation of the cleaning agent.

None known

Residual dyes or pigments in nonwoven base

Polypropylene nonwovens can contain whitening agents or colorants, but heavy metals (cadmium, lead) and azo dyes are not typical or required in wipe production. No specific data on Method's supplier practices is publicly available, but no recalls or complaints related to dye toxicity have been reported.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth if stored improperly

Nonwoven wipes with embedded liquid are susceptible to microbial growth if exposed to warm, damp conditions or if the package is opened and left unsealed. This is a storage and usage issue rather than a formulation hazard, but relevant to safe handling.

Possible

Contact dermatitis from cleaning agent or wipe material

Polypropylene itself is hypoallergenic, but the cleaning formula inside can trigger irritation in individuals with sensitive skin. Method's plant-based formulas are generally gentler than petroleum-based alternatives, but fragrance and preservatives in the liquid are potential irritants; test on a small area first if you have sensitive skin.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 75% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Cleaning Wipes

Disinfecting Wipes Seventh Generation

Seventh Generation Disinfecting Wipes

Disinfecting Wipes Seventh Generation

nonwoven fabric (polypropylene/polyester blend), quaternary ammonium disinfectant

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern: Seventh Generation's transparent stance and third-party certifications support a safer choice for disinfecting wipes.

MADE SAFE CertifiedEPA Safer Choice

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Better Life All Purpose Wipes

Better Life

All Purpose Wipes

nonwoven fabric blend (cellulose/polypropylene base)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern choice; no known PFAS risk in basic all-purpose wipe formulations.

Risky category by default

EO Cleansing Hand Wipes Lavender 10 CT

Ecos

EO Cleansing Hand Wipes Lavender 10 CT

nonwoven cellulose/plant-based wipe with water and plant extracts

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; routine hand wipes with no obvious treatment triggers.

Risky category by default

More cleaning wipes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.