Maxima · Fishing Line
Maxima Fishing Line
Lower PFAS concern than treated apparel, but fishing line coatings remain opaque, no brand disclosure available.
Maxima fishing line is extruded nylon monofilament, which intrinsically carries lower PFAS risk than water-repellent coating-treated textiles. However, Maxima makes no public statement about PFAS in coatings, UV absorbers, or slip agents.
Shop Maxima on Amazon →Material
Nylon monofilament line
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Maxima Fishing Line is extruded nylon monofilament, a synthetic polymer that is chemically inert under normal freshwater and saltwater conditions. Nylon monofilament does not degrade into microplastics during typical casting, storage, or retrieval cycles. The main exposure pathway, if any, would be handling contact or ingestion of shed fibers, not leaching into water or food.
The brand's record and disclosure
Maxima (Berkley/Pure Fishing subsidiary) does not publicly disclose PFAS content, coating chemistry, or third-party testing results for its monofilament lines. The brand has no known recalls or regulatory violations specific to chemical hazards. Transparency on fluorocarbon coatings or additives remains absent across Maxima's product information.
How it compares in its category
Standard nylon monofilament lines (Maxima, Berkley, Trilene, etc.) are chemically comparable; none publish hazard data. Braided and fluorocarbon-coated lines may carry higher PFAS burden due to coating treatments, but monofilament alone is among the least chemically complex fishing line types. Biodegradable or plant-based fishing lines remain niche and less established.
If you buy it
Store spools in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent UV brittleness, which can accelerate shedding. Discard frayed or cracked line rather than rewrap, as damaged nylon fragments are a minor ingestion risk. Used line should be collected and disposed of in trash or recycling programs designed for synthetics, never left as aquatic litter. Line strength and handling performance degrade over 2-3 years of storage even if unused.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Microplastic shedding from UV degradation
Aged or cracked nylon monofilament can fragment into small particles. Risk is primarily to aquatic ecosystems if line is discarded in water, not to the user during normal fishing.
Coating additives or UV stabilizers (undisclosed)
Nylon fishing line typically includes colorants and UV absorbers to extend shelf life. Maxima does not disclose these additives, so heavy metals (e.g., cadmium-based yellow pigments) or other stabilizers cannot be ruled out without testing.
Dye migration or residue on skin/hands
No established reports of color bleeding or skin irritation from Maxima monofilament contact. Dyes used are generally fixed in the polymer matrix during extrusion.
Ingestion risk from shed fibers
Fragments of monofilament can lodge in throat or digestive tract if accidentally ingested (rare in normal use). Risk increases with age and brittleness of the line.
Opaque coating chemistry (PFAS and others)
Maxima does not disclose whether lines are fluorocarbon-coated or treated with water-repellent finishes that often contain PFAS. The undisclosed nature of coatings prevents full assessment.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Fishing Line
Stren
Original
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Lower PFAS concern for a fishing line product; no coating or treatment typical of PFAS carriers.
⚠Risky category by default
Maxima
Ultragreen One Shot
Lubricant/chain oil (mineral or synthetic base)
Lower PFAS concern for a chain lubricant; minimal Teflon-family coating/waterproofing risk profile.
⚠Risky category by default
Seaguar
Blue Label
Fluorocarbon fishing line (monofilament)
Fluorocarbon fishing line may contain PFAS; insufficient public data to grade definitively.
⚠Risky category by default
More fishing line grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.