85/ 100
B
OverallB81/100
Maxima Clear Monofilament Fishing Line

Maxima · Fishing Line & Fishing Tackle

Maxima Clear Monofilament Fishing Line

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Nylon monofilament unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict: BuyMonofilament nylon fishing line poses minimal established chemical hazards; PFAS unlikely in this material class; no brand safety controversies on record.

Maxima monofilament is extruded nylon, a synthetic polymer not typically treated with PFAS. No brand disclosure available, but material class carries inherently lower risk than coated or treated products.

Shop Maxima on Amazon →

Material

Monofilament nylon fishing line

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Maxima Clear Monofilament is extruded nylon (polyamide 6 or 6.6), a thermoplastic polymer designed for tensile strength and water resistance in fishing applications. The material itself does not require flame retardants, plasticizers like phthalates, or reactive dyes typical of textiles, reducing typical polymer hazard pathways. The "clear" designation typically refers to optical clarity achieved through polymer purity and processing, not coating or pigment additives that would introduce heavy metals or dyes.

The brand's record and disclosure

Maxima (owned by Rapala VMC Corporation) does not publicly maintain detailed chemical disclosure statements or third-party safety certifications for monofilament products. No significant safety recalls or regulatory actions specific to Maxima fishing line have been established in public databases. The brand's silence on PFAS and other chemical use is typical of the fishing tackle industry, which operates with minimal transparency compared to consumer cookware or apparel sectors.

How it compares in its category

Monofilament fishing line carries inherently lower chemical hazard burden than fluorocarbon lines (which may contain PFOA-related compounds) or braided lines that may use synthetic dyes or coatings. Maxima Clear is a mid-to-premium offering in the monofilament segment and compares favorably to budget alternatives in terms of manufacturing consistency, though no independent testing differentiates brands on leachables or contaminants. The product category itself is not subject to FDA food-contact regulations, EPA packaging rules, or consumer product safety standards that would mandate disclosure.

If you buy it

Store the spool in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight; UV exposure degrades nylon and may accelerate any minor leaching of oligomers or processing residues into water (though risk is low). Replace line seasonally or after visible wear, stress, or discoloration; aged monofilament loses strength and may shed microparticles, though this is a functional rather than toxicological concern. There is no need for special handling or washing; simply rinse with freshwater after saltwater use to remove salt and sediment, not to mitigate chemical exposure.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Nylon polymer oligomers and additives leaching

Nylon monofilament may release trace oligomers or processing residues into water over extended exposure, but no studies have documented hazardous levels from fishing line specifically, and the amount contacted by food or drinking water is negligible in typical use.

Possible

Microplastic shedding

Degraded or broken monofilament fragments persist in aquatic environments and contribute to microplastic pollution; this is an environmental rather than direct consumer hazard, but relevant to product lifecycle impact.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or UV absorbers

Clear monofilament typically contains no added pigments or dyes that would introduce cadmium, lead, or other heavy metals; any UV stabilizers are standard industry polymeric additives without documented heavy metal content.

None known

Formaldehyde or volatile organic compounds off-gassing

Nylon monofilament is not manufactured with formaldehyde-releasing resins or high-VOC coatings; any odor is residual solvent from extrusion, which disperses rapidly and poses no inhalation risk in normal handling.

None known

Bacterial or fungal growth in storage

Unlike water filters or absorbent materials, monofilament does not provide a growth substrate; it is inert and water-resistant, so contamination during storage is minimal if kept dry.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More fishing line & fishing tackle grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.