Maxfli · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Maxfli Men's 2024 One Size Golf Glove
Golf glove likely treated for water resistance; PFAS disclosure absent.
Golf gloves typically use water-repellent coating coatings for water resistance, commonly PFAS-based historically. Maxfli provides no PFAS disclosure or testing data publicly available.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather or synthetic leather with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Maxfli 2024 golf gloves combine leather or synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PU microfiber) with a water-resistant topical treatment. The water-repellent finish is almost certainly a fluorochemical coating to shed moisture during play; this class of treatment is the primary driver of PFAS exposure in performance apparel. Synthetic leather variants avoid hide tanning chemicals but introduce polyurethane processing byproducts and adhesives. The glove contacts bare skin for extended periods, allowing dermal absorption of coating residues.
The brand's record and disclosure
Maxfli, a Callaway Sports subsidiary, does not publish safety data sheets, material composition transparency reports, or PFAS phaseout commitments for golf products. No recall history specific to chemical hazards is publicly recorded. The brand has not signed the Cradle to Cradle or Bluesign certifications that would restrict fluorochemical use. Competitor brands (Titleist, Ping) similarly remain silent on glove coating chemistry, suggesting industry-wide opacity rather than Maxfli-specific negligence.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a niche apparel segment with minimal regulatory scrutiny. Most competitors use identical water-resistant fluorochemical treatments; Maxfli does not stand out as worse. Uncoated leather or synthetic-leather alternatives exist but sacrifice performance in wet conditions. No major golf brand has published PFAS-free glove options, making this a category-wide concern rather than a brand-specific gap.
If you buy it
Wash hands thoroughly after each use before eating or touching face to reduce dermal residue transfer. Avoid storing in heat or direct sunlight, as polymer coatings degrade and may off-gas volatile compounds. Replace when the water-beading effect visibly diminishes or leather shows cracking, typically 1-2 seasons of regular use. Do not machine wash or dry; hand rinse with cool water only, as hot water and detergents accelerate coating breakdown and leaching.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in water-resistant coating
Water-repellent finishes on performance golf gloves are typically Teflon-family coating-based compounds (Teflon-type coating, AFFF precursors, or long-chain fluorochemicals). No independent test results for this SKU are available; Maxfli provides no safety documentation.
Formaldehyde in synthetic-leather adhesives and dyes
Synthetic leather substrates are bonded to backing layers using formaldehyde-releasing resins; water-resistant dye-setting processes may also use formaldehyde releasers. Leather variants avoid this but introduce tanning chemical residues. Glove-level testing has not been published by the brand.
Azo dyes in leather or synthetic colorants
Golf gloves are typically dark-colored (black, brown, white) to hide soil. Azo dyes used in leather tanning or synthetic leather printing may include banned carcinogenic amines. Leather tanneries outside North America and Europe often use unregulated azo palettes.
Coating degradation and microparticulate shedding
Water-resistant polymer coatings on apparel shed microparticles during washing and wear, especially once cracking begins. These particles may contain fluorochemical residues. Glove-specific degradation rates are not quantified in public literature.
Allergen residues in dyes and finish chemicals
Workers and users may experience contact dermatitis from uncrosslinked dye or resin monomers, particularly if gloves are worn immediately after manufacture without adequate airing. Maxfli does not disclose curing or off-gassing protocols.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.