Maxfli · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Maxfli Men's 2024 Honors Golf Glove
Leather glove with likely water-repellent coating treatment; manufacturer silent on PFAS.
Golf gloves typically use leather and synthetic materials with water-resistant finishes. No brand disclosure on PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry. Risk depends on which water-repellent treatment is used.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather palm, synthetic back, moisture-wicking lining
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Maxfli Honors uses a leather palm (likely cabretta or similar goat leather) paired with synthetic back and moisture-wicking lining. Leather itself is a natural material with low acute toxicity, but the processing chemicals (tanning agents, dyes, finishes) and any water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings applied post-manufacture are the safety variables. The synthetic back and lining raise questions about polyester or nylon content, which may contain residual dyes, antimony catalysts, or flame retardants depending on supplier.
The brand's record and disclosure
Maxfli, owned by Dick's Sporting Goods, has no published materials safety disclosure, PFAS commitment statement, or third-party certifications (e.g., bluesign, OEKO-TEX) on record for this glove. The brand remains silent on water-repellent coating chemistry, leather tanning process, and synthetic component sourcing. This absence of transparency is typical for mid-tier golf equipment but limits consumer ability to verify manufacturing hazard controls.
How it compares in its category
Most golf gloves in this price/performance segment (premium amateur-level) use similar leather-synthetic hybrids with water-repellent coating finishes and do not disclose PFAS status. Higher-end alternatives from established brands (e.g., Titleist, Callaway) occasionally cite sustainable sourcing or tanning standards but rarely commit to PFAS avoidance. Budget gloves often use lower-grade leather and cheaper coatings with higher contamination risk; this product sits mid-range with unknown coating chemistry.
If you buy it
Wash hands after use and before eating to minimize any residual coating or dye contact, especially during break-in. Avoid heat exposure (direct sun storage, washers, dryers); air-dry only. Replace every 12-18 months or when palm shows wear or coating flaking, as degraded synthetic backing or separated palm may shed microfibers or concentrated residues. Store in a breathable pouch to prevent mold growth and chemical off-gassing in sealed bags.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing resins in tanning or finishing
Standard leather tanning and synthetic textile finishing can involve formaldehyde-based processes; no published data confirms or denies their use in Maxfli gloves. Off-gassing risk is low on skin contact but higher during first weeks of use.
Azo dyes in leather or synthetic components
Leather and synthetic back dyes may include azo compounds if sourced from low-cost suppliers without OEKO-TEX or similar certification. No specific testing of this glove is on record; risk is typical for uncertified leather goods.
Antimony catalyst residues in polyester or nylon backing/lining
Synthetic fibers often use antimony trioxide as a polymerization catalyst; trace residues may remain. Dermal absorption during normal glove use is considered low, but risk rises if lining degrades or glove is damaged.
water-repellent coating degradation and particle shedding
Water-repellent coatings on athletic gloves wear with repeated wash and use. As coating flakes, absorbed moisture, dirt, and microscopic debris mix, increasing exposure to underlying treated fabric and potential inhalation of microparticulates during extended play.
Contact dermatitis from dyes, tanning residues, or lining synthetics
Individuals with sensitive skin or latex/synthetic allergies may react to undisclosed chemical residues in either leather or the moisture-wicking lining. Pre-use hand-washing and short wear trials are prudent for new users.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 58% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.