Maxfli · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Maxfli 2026 Tour Golf Glove
Golf glove waterproofing likely uses water-repellent coating, PFAS status unclear
Maxfli golf gloves typically feature waterproof coatings to shed moisture and improve grip. Brand does not disclose PFAS use or absence; waterproof finishes commonly contain PFAS historically, though some manufacturers now use alternatives.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather or synthetic upper with waterproof treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Maxfli 2026 Tour Glove uses either genuine leather or synthetic upper material with a waterproof treatment layer. Golf gloves require water resistance to maintain grip in wet conditions, typically achieved through water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings. These coatings are the primary chemical concern in this product, as legacy water-repellent coating formulations often contained PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals"). No public disclosure exists for Maxfli's specific water-repellent coating chemistry or whether they have transitioned to PFAS-free alternatives.
The brand's record and disclosure
Maxfli is owned by Dick's Sporting Goods and is not widely known for independent chemical transparency or third-party certifications in apparel safety. The brand has not made public statements about PFAS avoidance in waterproof products, nor do they publish material safety data sheets for consumer gloves. No major recalls or chemical controversies specific to Maxfli gloves are on public record, but the absence of transparency is itself a limitation.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a niche apparel segment where waterproofing is nearly universal, making PFAS exposure risk broadly similar across brands unless explicitly marketed as PFAS-free. Premium brands like Callaway and TaylorMade have not systematically disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry either. Maxfli positions itself as value-oriented, which may correlate with older formulation stock, though this is speculative without testing data.
If you buy it
Wash the glove in cool water after use to reduce salt and sweat accumulation, which degrades waterproofing over time. Do not expose to heat sources or tumble dry, as this can break down the water-repellent coating layer. Inspect for visible coating wear or loss of water beading monthly. Replace when waterproofing visibly fails or after 1-2 seasons of regular play, as re-treatment is typically not cost-effective.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in waterproof water-repellent coating
Golf glove waterproofing almost certainly uses fluorinated water-repellent coating chemistry; Maxfli has not disclosed whether this includes legacy PFAS compounds or newer alternatives. No testing data available for this specific product.
Formaldehyde in synthetic upper or fabric treatments
Synthetic leather and textile gloves may use formaldehyde-based resins for durability, but no specific reports or complaints exist for Maxfli golf gloves. Exposure is minimal due to brief skin contact during use.
Heavy metals in dyes (if synthetic material)
Synthetic gloves may use metal-containing dyes, but golf gloves are typically dyed in neutral colors with low risk. No known issues reported for Maxfli brand.
Azo dyes or restricted chemical dyes
No public records of azo dyes or banned colorants in Maxfli gloves; brand does not make safety claims that would flag concern here.
Skin irritation from finish treatments or materials
Some users report mild irritation from synthetic glove treatments or residual factory finishes; washing before first use typically resolves this. Genuine leather gloves pose lower risk of chemical irritant reaction.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.