75/ 100
C
OverallF47/100
ULINE Lysol No Rinse Sanitizer

Lysol · Hand Sanitizer

ULINE Lysol No Rinse Sanitizer

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, typical liquid sanitizer without known fluorochemical use, but brand offers no transparency.

Verdict: BuyLysol No Rinse Sanitizer uses established antimicrobial chemistry with no known acute chemical hazards; lower PFAS risk typical of liquid formulations; safe for intended use.

Lysol No Rinse Sanitizer is a quaternary ammonium-based liquid disinfectant with no disclosed use of PFAS, Teflon-family coating, or water-repellent coatings. As a simple antimicrobial solution, it carries lower inherent PFAS risk compared to treated textiles or grease-resistant coatings.

Shop Lysol on Amazon →

Material

Aqueous disinfectant solution (active: alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium saccharinate)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is an aqueous (water-based) disinfectant containing alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium saccharinate as the active antimicrobial agent. This quaternary ammonium compound (quat) is a well-established surface and hand sanitizer chemistry used across consumer and institutional products for decades. The aqueous carrier means no volatile organic solvents are present, reducing inhalation risk compared to alcohol-based alternatives. Because it requires no rinsing, residue on skin or surfaces is intentional and designed to be safe at typical use concentrations.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lysol (Reckitt Benckiser) has faced regulatory scrutiny over misleading marketing claims regarding antimicrobial efficacy and COVID-19 effectiveness, resulting in FTC settlements. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS content or manufacturing transparency for this product line. No major recalls specific to chemical hazards in this formulation are on record, though Lysol's parent company has faced broader criticism for opacity on ingredient sourcing. Third-party certification (e.g., EPA-registered disinfectant) provides some assurance of antimicrobial performance claims.

How it compares in its category

No-rinse hand sanitizers divide into three types: alcohol-based (ethanol 60-95%), quat-based (like this product), and alcohol-free botanical alternatives. Quat formulations avoid the drying skin effects of alcohols and evaporation risk, making them gentler for frequent use. They are generally considered less effective against certain enveloped viruses than high-concentration alcohol, though adequate for routine bacteria and non-enveloped microbes. This product sits in the middle tier of cost and efficacy within the quat category.

If you buy it

Apply to dry hands and allow 20-30 seconds contact time for full antimicrobial activity; do not rinse unless skin irritation occurs. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent active ingredient degradation; check expiration dates as efficacy declines over time. Discontinue use if redness, rash, or irritation develops, as quat compounds can sensitize skin in some individuals with repeated exposure. For high-frequency users (healthcare workers, food handlers), consider rotating between quat and alcohol-based products to minimize skin barrier disruption.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Skin sensitization from quaternary ammonium compounds

Quat-based sanitizers are documented to cause contact dermatitis or irritant dermatitis with prolonged or repeated use in susceptible individuals. Risk increases with frequent application (>5 times daily) and pre-existing sensitive skin or eczema.

Reported

Eye irritation from splash or mist

No-rinse sanitizers can cause conjunctival irritation if splashed directly into eyes. Lysol product labels carry standard eye irritant warnings; contact lens wearers should remove lenses before application.

Possible

Microbial contamination if contaminated during use

Once-opened bottles or dispensers can accumulate bacteria if shared among multiple users or stored in warm, humid environments. This does not reflect product manufacturing safety but rather post-purchase handling.

None known

Inhalation of spray aerosol (if spray formulation)

ULINE specifically lists 'No Rinse Sanitizer' as a liquid product, not aerosol spray, so inhalation risk from propellants is absent. If dispensed as pump or pour, aerosolization is minimal.

Reported

Ingestion risk (accidental)

Quaternary ammonium compounds are toxic if ingested in quantities above ~1% concentration. This product is labeled for external use only; child-resistant packaging is not mandatory but recommended for households with young children.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Hand Sanitizer

Hand Wash Natural Seventh Generation

Seventh Generation

Hand Wash Natural Seventh Generation

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; MADE SAFE certification and plant-based formula reduce PFAS risk significantly.

MADE SAFEEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Hydrating Antibacterial Hand Mist

Seventh Generation

Hydrating Antibacterial Hand Mist

Water-based cosmetic spray (alcohol, water, plant extracts, preservatives)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower-concern choice; hand mist format and brand transparency reduce PFAS risk, though no dedicated lab testing published.

MADE SAFELeaping Bunny

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

The Honest Company SANI SPRAY-2OZ-GRAPEFRUIT

Honest Company

The Honest Company SANI SPRAY-2OZ-GRAPEFRUIT

Water-based formula (spray disinfectant)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern buy; transparent brand with third-party backing on PFAS.

Made Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More hand sanitizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.