Lilith · Tampons
Lil-Lets Non-Applicator Super Plus Tampons X 96 | 6 Packs of 16 | Heavy Flow & Non-Applicator Super Plus Extra Tampons X 84 | 6 Packs of 14 | Very
Lower PFAS concern for a basic uncoated tampon; no red flags but no transparency.
Lil-Lets tampons are standard cotton/rayon absorbent products with no reported waterproof, stain-resistant, or nonstick coatings, the typical material categories with lower PFAS risk. The brand makes no PFAS claims and offers no third-party verification.
Shop Lilith on Amazon →Material
Cotton/rayon absorbent core, no reported coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Lil-Lets Non-Applicator tampons use a conventional cotton and rayon blend core without reported waterproof or antimicrobial coatings. This simplicity is a safety advantage: no synthetic polymer barriers means minimal leaching risk from degraded coatings or synthetic adhesives. The absorbent fibers are bleached (standard for menstrual products) but uncoated designs avoid the potential for coating particulates or chemical additives that sometimes appear in premium "comfort" variants.
The brand's record and disclosure
Lilith (Lil-Lets parent company) has not published explicit material safety data sheets or PFAS testing results for this product line, which is common for the tampon category but limits independent verification. No recalls or safety warnings specific to Lil-Lets tampons are on record with major regulatory bodies. The brand does not advertise organic or certified-pesticide-free cotton, so residual agrochemicals on raw fiber cannot be ruled out but are not flagged as a known issue in this product.
How it compares in its category
Non-applicator tampons like this sit at the simpler end of the market design spectrum, which generally correlates with fewer chemical additives than applicator or "ultra-comfort" variants. Comparable uncoated brands (e.g., Tampax Regular, store-brand non-applicators) share the same material profile. Lil-Lets does not claim organic certification or third-party testing, placing it in the mainstream hygiene product tier where ingredient transparency is low across the board.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from prolonged humidity to prevent mold or bacterial growth on cardboard/fiber. Change tampons every 4-8 hours and alternate with pads if flow is very heavy to reduce toxic shock syndrome risk. Do not flush applicators if any are included in future batches; dispose in trash. No special handling needed for this uncoated design; standard menstrual hygiene practices apply.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Bleach residues / dioxins from processing
Cotton and rayon fibers in tampons are typically chlorine-bleached during manufacturing. While regulatory limits on dioxin residues in finished menstrual products exist in some jurisdictions, no specific testing or disclosure from Lil-Lets is available for this product. Residual levels are generally considered low after rinsing, but complete absence cannot be confirmed without lab analysis.
Agrochemical residues (pesticides) on raw cotton
Conventional cotton is a heavily pesticide-treated crop. No certification or sourcing statement from Lil-Lets indicates organic or low-residue cotton for this product, so pesticide residues on fibers are not ruled out. Regulatory limits on final product residues are typically set, but individual batches are not disclosed.
Rayon production chemicals (caustic soda, sulfuric acid residues)
Rayon is produced via viscose process involving strong caustic and acid chemistry. No reports of hazardous residues in finished tampons from Lil-Lets or competitors; industrial rinsing is standard. This is not a recognized concern in menstrual product safety literature, but full process disclosure is unavailable.
Bacterial or mold growth if stored damp
Uncoated cotton/rayon absorbs moisture readily. If stored in humid bathrooms or damp packaging, microbial colonization can occur before use, raising infection risk. This is a usage/storage issue, not a manufacturing defect specific to Lil-Lets, but applies to all conventional tampons.
Fragrance or deodorant additives (if any) causing allergic reaction
Product name indicates 'Non-Applicator Super Plus' with no mention of fragrance or scent masking. Lil-Lets does not disclose added fragrance compounds in standard product lines. No known allergic incidents reported for this variant, but full ingredient list is not publicly available.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Tampons
Seventh Generation
Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator
organic cotton (tampon & applicator core); cardboard applicator
Lower-concern buy, organic cotton & MADE SAFE cert reduce PFAS risk, though brand is silent on the topic.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Cotton Tampons
organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)
Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Cora
Organic Tampons with Applicator
organic cotton tampon with cardboard/plastic applicator
Lower-concern choice; organic base material and MADE SAFE cert suggest thoughtful sourcing, but no explicit PFAS commitment.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More tampons grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.