75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Lever 2000 Aloe & Cucumber Body Wash

Lever Soothe · Body Wash

Lever 2000 Aloe & Cucumber Body Wash

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS risk; rinse-off cosmetic with no known treatment.

Verdict: BuyRinse-off aqueous cosmetic with no established safety recalls; lower inherent hazard profile typical of liquid body wash category.

Lever 2000 body wash is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no typical PFAS application (no waterproofing, stain-resistance, or nonstick coating needed). No brand claims or independent testing found; typical formulation suggests lower concern.

Shop Lever Soothe on Amazon →

Material

aqueous liquid body wash, glycerin/water base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Lever 2000 Aloe & Cucumber is a water and glycerin-based liquid body wash, not a solid bar or cream. The aqueous matrix means most potential contaminants are either dissolved or suspended and rinsed away during use, reducing dermal exposure compared to leave-on products. Glycerin is a humectant with no known toxicity at cosmetic concentrations. Botanical extracts (aloe, cucumber) are present in minor amounts as fragrance and skin-feel agents; no established hazards are on record for these at typical dilutions in rinse-off products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lever (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose detailed PFAS testing or avoidance commitments specific to body wash lines, though the parent company has faced increasing scrutiny on "forever chemicals" in personal care. No recalls or safety violations specific to Lever 2000 body wash are on record with FDA or CPSC. The brand provides basic ingredient lists on packaging but does not volunteer third-party certifications (e.g., EWG verification, cruelty-free standards) that might signal heightened safety transparency.

How it compares in its category

Liquid body washes are generally lower-risk than solid bars or cream cleansers because they are completely rinsed away and contain no baked-on coatings or long-chain emulsifiers that accumulate on skin. Lever 2000 is a mass-market product with formulation stability across production; it does not position itself as organic, dermatologist-tested, or hypoallergenic, placing it in the standard commercial segment rather than premium or clinical tiers. Compared to bar soaps, body washes carry slightly higher microplastics and preservative risk, though Lever 2000 shows no evidence of microbeads or unusual additive loads.

If you buy it

Use as directed (apply to wet skin, lather, rinse thoroughly). No special storage precautions are required; keep the bottle sealed to prevent bacterial colonization of the aqueous base, which can occur if left open or diluted with tap water. Discontinue use if skin irritation, rash, or allergic reaction occurs and consult a dermatologist. For individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance allergies, patch-test a small amount on the inner arm first; the cucumber and aloe fragrances are not uncommon allergens but affect a minority of users.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Body washes typically contain fragrance blends; aloe and cucumber extracts can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitized individuals, though prevalence is low in the general population. No specific allergenic incidents are on record for this product.

Possible

Preservative system (formaldehyde releasers)

Aqueous body washes require preservatives to prevent microbial growth; common agents include methylisothiazolinone (MIT) and imidazolidinyl urea. Neither is banned in cosmetics, but MIT has caused contact allergies in some users. Lever 2000 does not disclose its specific preservative chemistry on publicly available sources.

None known

Microplastics

Lever 2000 Aloe & Cucumber does not list microbeads or plastic particles in published ingredients. Liquid body washes from major manufacturers have largely phased out microbeads following the Microbead-Free Waters Act (2015).

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or colorants

No FDA safety alerts or recalls cite heavy metal contamination in Lever 2000 products. Cosmetic colorants in body wash are regulated and typically do not accumulate on skin due to rinse-off format.

Possible

Bacterial contamination in stored product

Aqueous body washes can develop bacterial or fungal growth if the bottle is left open, contaminated, or if water is introduced during use. This is a handling issue, not a manufacturing defect, and is preventable with normal care.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.