75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Lip Glace

Laura Mercier · Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

Lip Glace

C · Moderate

Lower concern, silicone lip cosmetics are not a known PFAS risk category, but brand transparency is absent.

Verdict: BuySilicone lip gloss with no established safety red flags; brand transparency on chemical disclosures is weak but product category carries minimal ingestion/absorption risk.

Laura Mercier Lip Glace is a silicone-based lip gloss with no published PFAS claims or certifications. Lip glosses are not typically formulated with Teflon-family coating or water/stain repellent coatings that commonly contain PFAS.

Shop Laura Mercier on Amazon →

Material

Silicone-based gloss, standard cosmetic pigments

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Laura Mercier Lip Glace is a silicone-based lip gloss, meaning the film-forming agent is typically a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or cyclic siloxane polymer rather than oils or resins. Silicone is inert on skin and not absorbed systemically, which makes it a relatively low-toxicity base for lip products. The color comes from standard cosmetic pigments (iron oxides, mica, or synthetic colorants like CI 77891). Because lips are a small exposure area with low permeability and the product sits on the surface rather than being absorbed, ingredient hazards that concern dermatologists in other cosmetics are muted here.

The brand's record and disclosure

Laura Mercier does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or PFAS avoidance statements on its website or product labels. The brand is owned by Estée Lauder, a major cosmetics conglomerate with no documented formal commitment to PFAS phase-out in lip products. No recalls, safety complaints, or regulatory actions specific to Lip Glace are on record. The brand's silence on chemical transparency is typical for mid-tier prestige cosmetics but represents a missed opportunity for consumer confidence.

How it compares in its category

Silicone-based lip glosses like this one are standard across prestige and mass-market brands (MAC Fix+, Charlotte Tilbury, etc.). They are generally safer than oil-based or wax-based alternatives because silicone does not degrade or oxidize on the lip and does not absorb fragrance allergens as readily. Compared to water-based gel glosses, silicone formulas last longer and are less prone to bacterial contamination, though they are also less eco-friendly. Laura Mercier's Lip Glace is middle-of-the-road for the category in terms of ingredient transparency.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to clean, dry lips; silicone can trap moisture and promote fungal growth if applied over damaged or inflamed skin. Replace the applicator or wand if it shows visible buildup or discoloration, as brushes can harbor bacteria. Store in a cool, dark place to prevent color separation or thickening. Because this product is not ingested in meaningful quantity and sits on the surface, the risk of systemic exposure to any hazardous ingredient is very low; normal use poses no special precautions.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Heavy metals in synthetic colorants

Standard cosmetic pigments used in lip gloss are regulated by the FDA and EU for lead, cadmium, and arsenic. No testing data or recalls for Laura Mercier Lip Glace suggest exceedance. Lip exposure is minimal.

Possible

Fragrance allergens

If the formula contains added fragrance or essential oils, potential for contact dermatitis exists on sensitive lips. Product labeling does not detail fragrance components, so specific allergen assessment is not possible from public information.

None known

Silicone bioaccumulation in silicone-based formula

Cyclic siloxanes in cosmetics are reviewed by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) panel as safe at use levels. No evidence of systemic accumulation from topical lip application. Silicone is not absorbed through intact skin.

Possible

Bacterial or fungal growth on applicator

The brush applicator can accumulate bacteria or fungi if not kept dry and if the product is used over broken skin. This is a hygiene and storage issue, not a product defect, and is common to all liquid or gel lip products.

None known

Talc contamination (if present)

Modern cosmetic-grade talc in lip products is not expected to contain asbestos and is tested for purity. Laura Mercier does not disclose talc use in Lip Glace, so contamination risk cannot be assessed, but the brand is not associated with talc-related recalls.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Oil base (likely mineral, plant, or synthetic esters); glass or plastic container

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for typical lip oil; no waterproof treatment triggers detected.

Risky category by default

tarte Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Tarte

Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Glass container with cosmetic liquid formula (oils, silicones, pigments)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern, glass lip plump is a straightforward cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Armani Beauty Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Armani Beauty

Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Glass container; proprietary gloss formula (undisclosed composition)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; glass packaging itself is PFAS-safe, but gloss formula composition remains undisclosed.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

More lip gloss & lip balm grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.