PFAS score
Kjus · Snow Pants
Formula Pro Insulated Ski Pant - KJUS ORANGE / 38
Skip until Kjus discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or provides third-party testing.
Kjus ski pants use water-resistant treatment on the outer shell, a typical application for fluorinated PFAS compounds, but the brand provides no public disclosure of the specific water-repellent coating chemistry or PFAS status. High-end technical apparel from this brand lacks transparency on forever chemicals.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic insulation + water-repellent coating-treated outer shell (coating unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 32% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Snow Pants
Volcom
Men's NWRK Baggy Pant
Cotton canvas blend (standard apparel textile)
Lower PFAS concern for basic baggy pants; no special finishes flagged, but Volcom has made no public PFAS commitments.
⚠Risky category by default
Roxy
Women's Backyard Pant
Nylon/polyester blend with cotton (standard casual pants)
Lower PFAS concern, standard textile pant without water-resistant coating, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
DC Shoes
DC Men's Primo Pant
Cotton/polyester blend twill pants
Lower concern for casual pants; no PFAS-prone treatments evident, but brand offers no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
More snow pants grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.