Kin+Kind · Shampoo
kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo
Lower concern for PFAS; typical rinse-off pet shampoo unlikely to contain deliberate fluorochemicals.
Kin+Kind makes plant-derived pet shampoos with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments that typically require PFAS. As a rinse-off liquid cosmetic, it poses lower PFAS risk than water-repellent coating textiles or nonstick cookware.
Shop Kin+Kind on Amazon →Material
aqueous shampoo base (surfactants, water, glycerin)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo is a water-based formulation containing surfactants (cleansing agents), glycerin (humectant), and botanical extracts marketed for sensitive or itchy skin. The product is designed to be diluted and rinsed thoroughly, which sharply limits skin contact time and absorption risk compared to leave-on products. As a rinse-off formula, residual chemicals are substantially removed during bathing, reducing systemic exposure.
The brand's record and disclosure
Kin+Kind positions itself as a natural pet care brand with claims around hypoallergenic and gentle formulations, though the company provides limited transparency on full ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this product line. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing results, which is typical for smaller natural brands but represents a gap in proactive safety communication.
How it compares in its category
Pet shampoos span a wide range of formulation philosophies, from heavily fragranced conventional products to minimalist botanical blends. Kin+Kind positions toward the natural/botanical end, which generally correlates with lower synthetic chemical burden, though botanical ingredients carry their own allergen and irritant variability. Most pet shampoos in this category carry similar low PFAS risk due to rinse-off use patterns; Kin+Kind does not stand out as higher or lower risk than comparable natural brands.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve botanical stability. Always dilute according to label directions; concentrated formulas are more likely to cause skin irritation if applied undiluted. If your pet develops redness, excessive itching, or other skin reactions after use, discontinue and consult a veterinarian. For pets with diagnosed allergies or sensitivities, patch-test on a small area first, as botanical extracts can trigger reactions in some animals even when labeled hypoallergenic.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and botanical extracts
Shampoos marketed with botanical ingredients (oat extract, aloe, etc.) can contain natural allergens and irritants. Individual pet sensitivity varies; some animals react to plant-derived compounds even in hypoallergenic formulas.
1,4-dioxane (surfactant contaminant)
No testing or contamination reports are on record for Kin+Kind products. However, 1,4-dioxane can occur as a manufacturing byproduct in some surfactants; the company does not publicly disclose supplier vetting for this contaminant.
Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
No reported use of DMDM hydantoin or other formaldehyde-releasing agents in this product. Kin+Kind's natural positioning suggests avoidance of this class, but ingredient transparency is limited.
Heavy metals in botanical pigments or additives
No testing or recalls indicate heavy metal contamination in Kin+Kind formulations. Risk is generally low in aqueous shampoos, but botanical extracts sourcing is not publicly disclosed.
Skin irritation from pH imbalance or surfactant harshness
All shampoos carry inherent irritation risk if pH is mismatched to pet skin (dogs typically 6.5-7.5) or surfactants are too stripping. Kin+Kind's gentle positioning suggests attention to this, but no published pH or surfactant strength data is available for verification.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Shampoo
Credo Beauty
Roz Salt Scalp Scrub
salt crystals, mineral-based scrub
Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Public Goods Shampoo Refill
aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo
Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash
water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution
Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.
⚠Risky category by default
More shampoo grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.