75/ 100
C
OverallF53/100
kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo Lemongrass

Kin+Kind · Shampoo

kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo Lemongrass

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for a liquid pet shampoo with no water-repellent or non-stick claims.

Verdict: BuyAqueous pet shampoo with botanical actives, no reported safety issues, lower PFAS profile, safe for intended use with standard precautions.

Kin+Kind's flea & tick shampoo is a rinse-off liquid product with no disclosed water-resistant, stain-resistant, or coating technologies, the primary PFAS risk vectors in personal care. The brand makes no PFAS claims and offers no third-party verification.

Shop Kin+Kind on Amazon →

Material

aqueous shampoo base with botanical actives (lemongrass)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo is a water-based formulation featuring lemongrass as the primary botanical active ingredient. The product contains surfactants (cleansing agents), preservatives, and fragrance compounds derived from or mimicking lemongrass essential oil. Unlike synthetic pesticide-based alternatives, botanical shampoos rely on plant-derived compounds for insect-repelling activity, which generally carry lower acute toxicity but require more frequent reapplication and may cause contact irritation in sensitive animals.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kin+Kind markets itself as a natural pet care brand but maintains silent positioning on PFAS use or avoidance. The brand does not prominently disclose third-party certifications (such as EPA Safer Choice, USDA Organic, or cruelty-free seals) on widely available product information. No major recalls or safety controversies for this specific product are on public record. Ingredient transparency is limited to standard product labeling without detailed breakdowns of preservative systems or fragrance constituents.

How it compares in its category

Pet flea shampoos range from synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations (higher efficacy, stricter EPA oversight) to plant-extract and essential-oil formulations (lower chemical load, variable efficacy). Kin+Kind sits in the botanical segment, competing with brands like Earthbath and Burt's Bees for Pets. Botanical options typically cost more, require more frequent use, and appeal to owners seeking gentler chemistry; they are less regulated than EPA-approved pesticide shampoos, which means fewer safety guarantees but also lower systemic toxin exposure.

If you buy it

Apply only as directed on the label, typically 1-2 times weekly for flea prevention or management. Avoid contact with the animal's eyes and ears; rinse thoroughly after the recommended contact time. Monitor your pet for signs of skin irritation, excessive scratching, or allergic reaction, particularly if the animal has sensitive skin or known sensitivities to plant oils. Store in a cool, dark place and replace if the product separates significantly, develops an off odor, or exceeds its shelf life, typically 12-24 months for liquid formulations.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Preservative system toxicity (formaldehyde releasers)

Aqueous shampoo bases typically use preservative systems such as imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin, or methyl/propyl parabens to prevent microbial growth. While these are generally recognized as safe at regulated levels, formaldehyde-releaser preservatives can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in susceptible animals. No specific allergen labeling for this product's preservative system

Possible

Essential oil and fragrance allergenicity

Lemongrass essential oil and lemongrass-derived fragrance compounds are common allergens in sensitive skin. Dogs and cats lack certain liver enzymes for efficient metabolism of some volatile plant constituents, potentially increasing irritation or sensitization risk. The product does not disclose whether the fragrance is pure essential oil, synthetic lemongrass isolates, or mixed; sensitivity vari

Reported

Botanical pesticide efficacy and residue

Lemongrass has documented repellent properties against certain flea and tick species, but efficacy is lower and shorter-duration than synthetic pesticides. Incomplete rinse or application on wet fur may leave residue; if ingested during grooming, botanical actives at high concentration pose low but non-zero risk of gastrointestinal irritation.

None known

Microbiological contamination if unmaintained

No recalls or contamination events on record for this product. Standard liquid shampoo hygiene (sealed cap, cool storage, prompt use after opening) prevents bacterial or mold growth. Risk is minimized by the preservative system and aqueous base, though opened bottles left in warm, humid bathrooms face generic contamination risk common to all liquid personal-care products.

Possible

Ingestion toxicity if swallowed in quantity

Accidental ingestion of shampoo during application is a routine concern in pet care. Lemongrass shampoo is generally of low acute toxicity, but surfactants and essential oil at high dose can cause mild gastrointestinal upset, drooling, or vomiting. Kin+Kind does not prominently display toxicity guidance; contact poison control or a veterinarian if significant ingestion occurs.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.