Kiehl's · Sunscreen
Kiehl's Better Screen UV Serum-In-Stick Sunscreen SPF 50+
Lower PFAS concern; typical emollient-based sunscreen without known water-repellent coating or fluorine additives.
Kiehl's Better Screen UV Serum-In-Stick is a standard cosmetic sunscreen formulation; no public evidence of PFAS surfactants, Teflon-family coating, or water-repellent coating coatings. The brand makes no PFAS disclosure either way.
Shop Kiehl's on Amazon →Material
Cosmetic serum/stick sunscreen base (likely silicones, waxes, mineral UV filters)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Kiehl's Better Screen UV Serum-In-Stick is formulated as a mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide) suspended in a silicone and wax base for stick delivery. The mineral UV filters are non-nano according to Kiehl's standard claims, meaning larger particles that sit on skin surface rather than penetrating. This formulation avoids chemical UV absorbers (oxybenzone, avobenzone) that carry endocrine concerns, and the stick format eliminates preservative loadings common in fluid sunscreens.
The brand's record and disclosure
Kiehl's (Estee Lauder subsidiary) maintains ingredient transparency on product pages but does not publish detailed third-party safety certifications or PFAS-specific statements. The brand has no recorded recalls for Better Screen products. Estee Lauder committed to reformulating away from some restricted chemicals by 2025 but has not disclosed PFAS phase-out timelines. No published third-party testing of this specific product for heavy metals or contaminants is on record.
How it compares in its category
Mineral stick sunscreens are considered safer than chemical alternatives for sensitive skin and pregnancy. This product sits mid-range in terms of ingredient simplicity compared to reef-safe or ultra-clean brands (EWG Verified, Badger) but above mass-market formulas heavy in synthetic fragrance and emulsifiers. The silicone base is standard in stick sunscreens and does not elevate safety concern compared to competitors.
If you buy it
Apply evenly to face and neck before sun exposure; reapply every 2 hours or after water exposure. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct heat (stick can soften above 30C). Do not ingest. Discontinue if irritation develops; mineral filters can cause white cast on deeper skin tones, which is cosmetic rather than a safety issue. Shelf life is typically 3 years unopened; replace if fragrance changes or separation occurs.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)
Product listing does not break down fragrance components; stick sunscreens typically contain synthetic fragrances or botanical extracts. No contact dermatitis complaints are established in public records for this specific product, but fragrance is a common sunscreen irritant in sensitive users.
Talc contamination (powder-form concern)
Stick format reduces talc likelihood versus powder sunscreens. Kiehl's does not list talc as an ingredient in Better Screen; no contamination reports on record.
Heavy metals in mineral UV filters
Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are regulated color additives in US sunscreens with established purity standards. No lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination is documented for this product or Kiehl's mineral filter supply chain.
Silicone leaching or bioaccumulation
Cyclopentasiloxane and dimethicone are common silicone emollients in stick sunscreens and are not classified as reproductive toxicants by major agencies. Environmental persistence of some cyclic siloxanes is documented, but dermal absorption is minimal and no bioaccumulation evidence exists in published literature for topical use.
Preservative-related sensitization
Stick format typically requires fewer preservatives than creams or lotions. Specific preservative list is not always disclosed on retail pages, but no product-specific sensitization complaints are on public record.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Sunscreen
Goddess Garden
Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz
mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes
Lower-concern mineral sunscreen with credible PFAS-exclusion certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)
Lower PFAS concern; mineral sunscreen with third-party verification and no known fluorochemical history.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging
Lower-concern choice; mineral sunscreen + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs reduce risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More sunscreen grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.