75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Kérastase Gloss Absolu Bain Hydra Glaze Shampoo

Kerastase · Shampoo

Kérastase Gloss Absolu Bain Hydra Glaze Shampoo

C · Moderate

Lower concern for typical PFAS risk; no known aqueous shampoo chemistry requires fluorochemicals.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo formulation with no established hazards; typical surfactant-based chemistry poses minimal consumer risk.

This is a rinse-off aqueous hair shampoo with no inherent product function that typically requires PFAS (no waterproofing, nonstick, or stain resistance needed). Kerastase does not claim PFAS-free status, and no independent lab data is publicly available.

Shop Kerastase on Amazon →

Material

aqueous surfactant-based shampoo formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Gloss Absolu Bain Hydra Glaze is a water-based shampoo containing anionic surfactants (cleansing agents), humectants (glycerin-type moisture retentants), and conditioning polymers typical of premium hair care. The formulation is designed to coat and seal the hair cuticle with hydrating agents rather than strip it. No unusual chemical classes requiring high-hazard scrutiny appear in the standard ingredient deck for this product line.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kerastase (L'Oreal subsidiary) does not prominently advertise PFAS-avoidance commitments, but aqueous shampoos are not a vector for fluorochemical use in mainstream formulations. The brand maintains standard cosmetic ingredient transparency via product labels and SDS availability. No major safety recalls or disclosed contamination events specific to this product line are on public record.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the premium shampoo segment with formulation complexity similar to salon-grade competitors (Moroccanoil, Olaplex, SheaMoisture). Water-based shampoos across this price tier carry equivalent low baseline hazard profiles; differentiation is primarily sensory and marketing rather than safety-driven. No material safety advantage or disadvantage versus alternatives at this price point.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp hair; rinse thoroughly to avoid scalp residue buildup. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve thickening polymers and fragrance stability. Replace every 6-12 months depending on use frequency. If scalp irritation develops, discontinue and patch-test with a single application on a small area before resuming full use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Kerastase shampoos contain fragrance compounds; individual sensitivity varies widely. No specific fragrance allergen concentration data is publicly disclosed for this formulation, so risk depends on personal skin reactivity rather than formulation defect.

None known

1,4-dioxane (solvent/surfactant byproduct)

Aqueous shampoo chemistry can generate trace 1,4-dioxane during manufacturing if anionic surfactants are ethoxylated without purification steps. No established 1,4-dioxane contamination has been reported for Kerastase products; this hazard is primarily a category-level concern for shampoos generally, not this product specifically.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers in preservative systems

Modern premium shampoos typically use gentler preservatives (phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone) rather than formaldehyde-releasing agents. No evidence of formaldehyde releasers in this product's documented ingredient profile or brand controversy history.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or colorants

Gloss Absolu formulations are clear or light amber liquids with no disclosed synthetic colorants requiring heavy metal testing. Pigment contamination is not a documented concern for this product line.

Possible

Scalp irritation from sulfate surfactants

Kerastase premium shampoos typically use sulfate-free or mild surfactant blends to differentiate from mass-market products, but exact anionic surfactant composition is proprietary. Mild irritation is possible with sensitive scalps but is a user-specific reaction rather than a formulation defect.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.