20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Kelty Asher 65L Backpack

Kelty · Waterproof Outdoor Gear

Kelty Asher 65L Backpack

F · High PFAS

Likely waterproofed with water-repellent coating; PFAS risk uncertain without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipNylon backpack with uncertain water-repellent coating chemistry; no major toxicity flags recorded, but PFAS disclosure absent and durability concerns warrant informed use.

Kelty's Asher backpack is nylon with water-repellent coating, typical for outdoor packs. No public PFAS commitment or testing data available from brand.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon with water-repellent coating water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Asher 65L uses nylon as its primary fabric, a synthetic polymer chosen for strength, water resistance, and weight efficiency in outdoor gear. Kelty applies a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to enhance weather protection, which is standard in the backpack category but creates uncertainty: water-repellent coating treatments have historically relied on PFAS-based chemistry, though some brands now use PFAS-free alternatives without public commitment. The fabric itself (nylon) is chemically stable and does not leach under normal use, but the treatment layer's composition remains undisclosed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kelty, a subsidiary of the Vista Outdoor conglomerate, does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating chemistry, PFAS status, or safety certifications for this model. No recall history, formaldehyde warnings, or azo-dye controversies are on record for this product. The brand has made no formal commitment to PFAS elimination or third-party testing transparency, placing it in the silent majority of outdoor brands that have not yet adopted full chemical accountability.

How it compares in its category

Nylon backpacks are standard in this weight class and durability tier; Kelty's construction is typical for the price point. Competitors like Osprey and The North Face similarly do not always disclose water-repellent coating chemistry, though some brands (notably Patagonia in select lines) have moved to PFAS-free treatments. The Asher 65L occupies a middle ground: reliable outdoor performer without premium transparency or budget-brand cost-cutting, making it functionally average but informationally opaque.

If you buy it

Hand wash with mild soap and cool water; avoid machine drying and direct heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating layer and void durability claims. Do not soak or immerse for extended periods, as this does not improve water resistance and may accelerate coating wear. Inspect the fabric seams and zipper annually; replace the pack if stitching separates or fabric abrades to bare nylon, signaling loss of structural integrity. Avoid storing in direct sunlight for months, as UV exposure weakens nylon over time.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating treatment chemistry (unspecified)

Nylon backpacks typically receive fluorinated or PFAS-containing water-repellent coating coatings; Kelty does not disclose the specific chemistry, leaving risk profile uncertain. If PFAS-based, exposure risk during use is low (treated surface remains external), but disposal and manufacturing impact are unknown.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in nylon finishing

No formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releaser presence has been reported for Kelty nylon backpacks. Nylon itself does not require formaldehyde curing; any resin use would be minimal and not documented as a concern in this product category.

None known

Azo dyes in fabric coloring

Kelty backpacks are not known to use prohibited azo dyes (those releasing carcinogenic amines). No recalls or testing failures on record for dye safety, and nylon is compatible with non-toxic dye systems standard in outdoor gear.

None known

Antimony in polyester components

The Asher 65L is primarily nylon; any polyester (zippers, webbing) is present in minor volumes. No antimony contamination has been reported for Kelty products, and levels in outdoor gear are typically below health thresholds if present.

Likely

Coating degradation and durability loss

water-repellent coating coatings on all backpacks degrade over 3-5 years with regular use and washing; this is not a toxicity hazard but a performance issue. Once the water-repellent finish wears away, the nylon itself absorbs moisture, increasing pack weight and reducing lifespan, necessitating retreatment or replacement.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Gear

Patagonia Refugio Day Pack 26L

Patagonia

Refugio Day Pack 26L

recycled nylon with non-fluorinated water-repellent coating treatment

F
F · High PFAS

Lower PFAS concern. Patagonia claims non-fluorinated water-repellent coating on this pack.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.