75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Johnson's Moisturizing Baby Lotion Coconut Oil

Johnson's Baby · Baby Lotion

Johnson's Moisturizing Baby Lotion Coconut Oil

C · Moderate

Lower concern: typical lotion formula with no known PFAS triggers, though no brand disclosure.

Verdict: BuyStandard baby lotion with no established contamination issues; water-and-glycerin base is safe; lower PFAS risk typical for this formula type.

Johnson's Baby Moisturizing Lotion uses standard emollient chemistry (water, glycerin, oils) with no documented Teflon-family coating, waterproofing treatments, or non-stick coatings that would warrant PFAS. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or claims.

Shop Johnson's Baby on Amazon →

Material

Water, glycerin, coconut oil, emollients

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This lotion is primarily water and glycerin (humectants that draw moisture into skin) with coconut oil as an emollient. The formula contains no known irritants like fragrance allergens or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives on the label. Coconut oil is a natural fatty acid that poses no toxicity risk at dermal exposure levels used in baby products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Johnson & Johnson has faced historical litigation over talc contamination in other baby products, but this lotion formula contains no talc. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or screening for this product, which is typical across the mass-market baby lotion category. No recent recalls exist for this specific lotion formulation. Certification status: no third-party safety certifications (hypoallergenic claim only).

How it compares in its category

Baby lotions in this price range typically contain similar water-glycerin-oil bases; this product is mainstream and formulaically unremarkable. Alternatives marketed as organic or PFAS-tested may offer incremental reassurance but no demonstrated safety advantage for typical use. Most major brands in this category share the same disclosure gap around PFAS.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, damp skin to maximize humectant benefit. No heat stability concern; this is not a cooking product. Replace if the bottle shows signs of bacterial contamination (cloudiness, odor change) or if your infant develops unexplained rash. Store in cool, dry conditions to prevent mold growth in the open container.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Product contains fragrance agents (coconut scent); potential for contact dermatitis in sensitive infants, though incidence is low with this formulation type.

None known

Preservative safety (formaldehyde releasers)

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (like imidazolidinyl urea) are listed on available ingredient data; standard safety preservatives appear to be used.

Possible

Microbial contamination

Lotion bottles with open-top dispensing can accumulate bacteria if not kept sealed; risk increases with age and storage conditions, not inherent to the formula.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or colorants

Product contains no added colorants and is formulated as a white opaque lotion; no pigment-based heavy metal risk identified.

None known

Talc contamination

This lotion formula does not list talc as an ingredient; talc-related litigation applies to Johnson's Baby Powder, not this lotion line.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 82% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Baby Lotion

The Honest Company Face Body Lotion

The Honest Company

Face Body Lotion

water, glycerin, plant oils, emulsifiers

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for this liquid cosmetic; brand claims and MADE SAFE badge support safe profile.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Honest Nourish Shampoo and Body Wash and Lotion Duo

The Honest Company

Honest Nourish Shampoo and Body Wash and Lotion Duo

aqueous surfactants, glycerin, plant extracts

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern choice; PFAS-free claim backed by third-party cert, though personal care is naturally low-risk category.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Tubby Todd Bath Co. Sun Sets

Tubby Todd

Bath Co. Sun Sets

water-based formulation, mineral & plant-derived actives

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern cosmetic; PFAS-free certified and no high-risk ingredients identified.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More baby lotion grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.