75/ 100
C
OverallF59/100
Jack Black Three You Need Shave Essentials Set

Jack Black · Shaving Cream

Jack Black Three You Need Shave Essentials Set

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; typical shave essentials lack traditional Teflon-family coating/water-repellent coating triggers, but no brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyJack Black shave essentials are aqueous cosmetics with no established hazard records; typical formulations pose minimal risk if used as directed.

Jack Black's shave set (likely gel, cream, cleanser) contains water-based cosmetics without obvious PFAS applications like nonstick coatings or heavy-duty water repellency. The brand makes no public PFAS statement.

Shop Jack Black on Amazon →

Material

Shave gel, cream, and cleanser (aqueous cosmetics)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Jack Black Three You Need Shave Essentials Set contains shave gel, cream, and cleanser formulated as water-based cosmetics. These products rely on surfactants, humectants (glycerin/sorbitol), and preservatives rather than problematic polymers or heavy metals. The aqueous base means no silicone-related off-gassing or thermal degradation risks that apply to stick or oil-based alternatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Jack Black (owned by Edgewell Personal Care) maintains no published position on PFAS avoidance in this product line and does not disclose ingredient sourcing or third-party testing results on their website. The brand has no documented safety recalls or regulatory actions on record for their shave products. No certifications (EWG, Leaping Bunny, etc.) are claimed for this set.

How it compares in its category

Shave gels and creams from mainstream brands (Gillette, Cremo, Art of Shaving) share similar aqueous-cosmetic profiles with comparable hazard profiles. Jack Black occupies the middle market with premium positioning but standard formulation practices. Specialized natural or mineral-based alternatives exist but offer no proven safety advantage for typical use.

If you buy it

Store products in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy. Do not ingest or use near eyes; rinse thoroughly with water if contact occurs. Check for visible separation, odor changes, or mold growth before each use as signs of degradation. Replace after 12 months of opening or if texture/smell shifts.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Preservative-related contact sensitization (formaldehyde releasers)

Aqueous cosmetics typically use parabens or methylisothiazolinone as preservatives; individual sensitivity varies. Jack Black does not publicly disclose preservative chemistry, so specific risk cannot be ruled out but is standard for the category.

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Jack Black shave products contain fragrance compounds that may trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in susceptible users. Unscented or fragrance-free alternatives exist if this is a known concern.

None known

Heavy metals in color additives (if pigmented)

No recalls or warnings have been issued for Jack Black shave products regarding lead, cadmium, or chromium in colorants. Regulatory oversight of cosmetic pigments is active; no specific testing results are public.

Possible

Bacterial or mold contamination (post-opening)

All aqueous cosmetics risk microbial growth if exposed to moisture, unclean applicators, or warm storage. This is a use-and-maintenance issue, not a manufacturing defect in Jack Black products.

Possible

1,4-dioxane contamination (trace impurity)

Some surfactants used in cosmetic foaming agents may carry trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Jack Black does not publish analytical data confirming absence; this is typical for mass-market shave products.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shaving Cream

Baxter of California Barbe Set

Baxter of California

Barbe Set

Stainless steel, brushes, standard cosmetic packaging

B
F
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern, standard grooming tools with no known PFAS indicators, though brand discloses nothing.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Kiehl's Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief

Kiehl's

Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief

Stainless steel blade; gel/cream formula (water, glycerin, botanical extracts)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern, standard razor and aftercare gel with no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing.

Risky category by default

Aesop Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion

Aesop

Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion

water-based serum and lotion emulsions in glass/plastic bottles

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for this leave-on cosmetic; no special coatings flagged.

Risky category by default

More shaving cream grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.