75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
IT Cosmetics CC+ Natural Matte Foundation

IT Cosmetics · BB Cream

IT Cosmetics CC+ Natural Matte Foundation

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS risk likely, but brand silence means no assurance.

Verdict: BuyLiquid foundation with no established safety red flags; standard cosmetic formulation; lower PFAS risk profile supports cautious use.

IT Cosmetics does not publicly disclose PFAS ingredients or make PFAS-free claims for this foundation. Conventional liquid foundations typically contain silicones and polymeric binders rather than fluorinated compounds, making direct PFAS concern lower than for waterproof cosmetics or treated textiles.

Shop IT Cosmetics on Amazon →

Material

liquid foundation (pigments, silicones, water, polymers)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

IT Cosmetics CC+ Natural Matte Foundation is a silicone-based liquid foundation containing water, cyclopentasiloxane (volatile silicone), polymers (likely acrylates or polyquaternium), iron oxides, and titanium dioxide for coverage and matte finish. Silicone foundations are generally stable at skin temperature and do not leach into skin; the pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide) are inert mineral colorants with low bioavailability. The matte finish likely comes from silica or similar matting agents rather than problematic coatings.

The brand's record and disclosure

IT Cosmetics (owned by L'Oreal) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient-safety testing, allergen screening, or PFAS testing on product pages. The brand has no documented recalls specific to this foundation line and no major established safety controversies on record. L'Oreal parent company maintains general cosmetic safety compliance but does not voluntarily exceed regulatory minimums for transparency on formulation hazards.

How it compares in its category

Silicone-based foundations like this are mainstream and broadly comparable in hazard profile to competitors (e.g., MAC Face and Body, Estee Lauder Double Wear). BB creams and tinted moisturizers often contain similar silicone bases and pigment loads. This product's matte finish places it mid-range; liquid foundations with heavy matting powders (talc, clay) pose higher inhalation risk, which this formulation likely avoids by using silica-based matting.

If you buy it

Apply only to clean, dry facial skin; avoid inhalation during application by applying in a well-ventilated space. Do not heat or expose the product to temperatures above 40C (104F) to prevent silicone volatilization. Replace every 6-12 months; watch for separation, color change, or odor shift as signs of microbial growth or degradation. Store away from direct sunlight and do not share applicators or brushes to reduce contamination risk.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

1,4-dioxane (cosmetic impurity)

Silicone-based foundations do not inherently require 1,4-dioxane as a solvent or stabilizer. No specific testing or detection reported for this product; risk is low but not independently verified by brand.

Possible

Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)

Iron oxides and titanium dioxide are inert and low-hazard, but trace contamination in mineral pigment batches is possible. IT Cosmetics does not publish heavy-metal testing data; typical industry testing would be performed by supplier, not disclosed to consumer.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

Liquid foundations typically use alternative preservatives (phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or parabens) rather than formaldehyde releasers. No specific formulation disclosure available for this product, but formaldehyde is uncommon in modern silicone foundations.

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Product name and marketing emphasize natural ingredients; ingredient list not fully disclosed on brand website. If fragrance compounds are included, they may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Recommend patch test before full facial application.

Possible

Silicone volatilization or cyclopentasiloxane inhalation

Cyclopentasiloxane is volatile and may be inhaled during application, especially in poorly ventilated spaces. Chronic inhalation risk is low at cosmetic-use concentrations, but short-term respiratory irritation is possible in sensitive users. Use in ventilated areas and avoid prolonged sniffing near the product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More bb cream grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.