25/ 100
F
OverallF3/100
Rare In N Out Burger Bags

In-N-Out Burger · Fast-Casual Food Packaging

Rare In N Out Burger Bags

F · High PFAS

High risk; PFAS common in food packaging coatings. Brand silent on composition.

Verdict: SkipPaper food packaging with likely fluorinated grease coating; PFAS risk high but product itself poses no other established hazards if used as intended.

In-N-Out burger bags use grease-resistant coatings typical in fast-food packaging, often containing PFAS or related chemicals. Brand provides no public disclosure on coating composition or PFAS avoidance.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper with likely grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

In-N-Out burger bags are paper-based with a grease-resistant coating applied to the interior surface. This coating prevents oil and moisture from soaking through and compromising structural integrity during food contact. The specific chemical identity of this coating is not publicly disclosed by the brand, but fluorinated compounds (PFOA, PFOS, or their replacements) are the industry standard for food-contact paper coatings because they resist both water and oil simultaneously. Non-fluorinated alternatives exist but are less effective at barrier performance under real-world conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

In-N-Out Burger does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of its packaging materials or provide certification of PFAS-free status. The company has not published statements on phasing out PFAS or transitioning to alternative coatings. No recalls or safety violations specific to this packaging are on record. This silence on a known industry concern represents a significant transparency gap relative to competitors and regulatory expectations.

How it compares in its category

Most fast-food paper packaging in the United States relies on fluorinated coatings for performance. In-N-Out's bags are typical of this standard, not exceptional in either direction. Some brands (e.g., chains adopting PFAS-free coatings or paper alternatives) have begun disclosing safer compositions, making In-N-Out's silence more conspicuous. The actual PFAS burden from a single bag is small, but frequent exposure across a diet heavy in takeout accumulates.

If you buy it

Use the bag for its intended purpose without modification. Do not heat food inside the bag in an oven or microwave, as elevated temperature can increase coating migration into fatty foods. Do not reuse the bag for storage or other purposes. Dispose of it in regular trash after use. If PFAS exposure is a personal health concern, minimize frequency of takeout meals in fluorinated paper packaging or request alternative wrapping (e.g., foil, cardboard sleeves) when possible.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS migration into food (reported in category)

Fluorinated coatings on paper food packaging are a documented source of PFAS dietary exposure, particularly with fatty or acidic foods. In-N-Out's silence on coating chemistry prevents verification of safer alternatives.

None known

BPA/BPS in inks or adhesives (none_known)

No reports of BPA or BPS contamination specific to In-N-Out bags. Modern food-contact inks are typically regulated, but composition is not publicly certified.

None known

Microplastic or synthetic polymer shedding (none_known)

Paper-based bags do not shed microplastics under normal use. Coating integrity degradation is not a documented issue at standard storage and handling temperatures.

Possible

Coating degradation and leachate increase with heat or prolonged contact (possible)

Reheating food in the bag or storing greasy food for extended periods may accelerate coating breakdown and increase migration of coating components into food, though this scenario is outside normal intended use.

None known

Heavy metals in printing inks (none_known)

No recalls or testing data linking In-N-Out bags to heavy metal contamination from inks. Food-contact printing is federally regulated, but independent verification is unavailable.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More fast-casual food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.