75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Huron Men's Moisturizing Body Wash

Hurricanes · Body Wash

Huron Men's Moisturizing Body Wash

C · Moderate

Lower-concern product; typical body wash formulation unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but brand makes no public commitment.

Verdict: BuyTypical body wash with no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern and standard formulation chemistry pose minimal consumer risk.

Body washes are low-risk for PFAS compared to treated textiles or non-stick cookware, as they lack water-repellent coatings, grease barriers, or Teflon-family coating finishes. Huron makes no disclosed PFAS claim or third-party certification, but the product category itself does not inherently demand PFAS use.

Shop Hurricanes on Amazon →

Material

aqueous body wash formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Huron Men's Moisturizing Body Wash is an aqueous formulation, meaning water-based with surfactants (cleansing agents), humectants (moisture retainers), and fragrance/preservative blends. Body washes do not involve high-heat cooking, coating degradation, or polymer breakdown like cookware or textiles, so thermal hazards are absent. The primary exposure route is dermal (skin contact), which for rinsed cleansers means brief contact before removal.

The brand's record and disclosure

Hurricanes (brand owner) has made no public commitment to PFAS avoidance or third-party safety certifications visible in standard consumer channels. The brand does not appear on major transparency databases or lists of companies with strong chemical disclosure policies. Without published ingredient lists, formulation transparency, or recall history readily available, assessment relies on product category norms rather than brand-specific commitments.

How it compares in its category

Body washes are lower-risk personal care products compared to leave-on items (lotions, deodorants) because they are rinsed away within minutes. This product sits in the mainstream segment; it is not marketed as natural, organic, or hypoallergenic, which would suggest different formulation risks. Most mass-market body washes in this price/positioning range have comparable hazard profiles unless specific allergens or preservatives are disclosed.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent preservative degradation and microbial growth. Use as directed (small amount, wet skin, rinse thoroughly). If skin irritation develops, discontinue and consult a dermatologist. Check the full ingredient list before purchase if you have known sensitivities to fragrance, sulfates, or common preservatives; the brand's opaque ingredient disclosure makes pre-screening difficult.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Body washes marketed for men often contain fragrance blends without full disclosure of individual compounds. Common fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool, cinnamyl alcohol) are widespread in consumer products; unknown whether Huron formulation includes them.

Possible

Preservative-related contact dermatitis

Aqueous formulations require preservatives to prevent bacterial/fungal growth. Parabens, methylchloroisothiazolinone, and phenoxyethanol are common in body washes; ingredient list unavailable for this product, so specific risk cannot be quantified.

None known

1,4-dioxane contamination

1,4-dioxane is a common impurity in personal care products containing certain surfactants and emulsifiers, not an intentional ingredient. No recall or testing data for Huron body wash is on record; risk reflects category norms, not brand-specific data.

Possible

Formaldehyde releasers in preservative systems

Some preservative blends (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin) release small amounts of formaldehyde over time. Without full ingredient disclosure from Hurricanes, presence cannot be ruled out.

None known

Heavy metal contamination in colorants/pigments

Body washes typically contain minimal colorants. No established recall history or testing data for Huron suggests this is not a concern, but opaque ingredient disclosure limits verification.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.