85/ 100
B
OverallB81/100
HONMA D1 Golf Balls 1-Dozen Multi

Honma · Golf Equipment & Balls

HONMA D1 Golf Balls 1-Dozen Multi

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. No PFAS treatment typical for golf balls.

Verdict: BuyGolf balls pose minimal consumer safety risk. Standard rubber/synthetic construction carries no established hazards; Honma has no known quality or disclosure problems.

Golf balls are typically rubber and synthetic polymer without intentional PFAS coatings. Honma makes no PFAS disclosure, but standard ball materials carry lower inherent risk than treated textiles or coated cookware.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Rubber core and synthetic cover (standard golf ball construction)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Honma D1 balls use a rubber core wrapped in a synthetic cover (likely Surlyn or similar polyurethane-based polymer), which is standard across the golf ball industry. This construction is chosen for durability and performance, not for chemical release. Golf balls do not come into direct prolonged contact with skin or food, and they are not heated during normal use, limiting exposure pathways for leaching or off-gassing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Honma is a Japanese golf equipment manufacturer with a long history in the sport; no recalls, material safety controversies, or regulatory actions are on record for their golf balls. The brand maintains silent stance on PFAS, which is typical for golf ball makers since PFAS is not a standard treatment in this category. No independent certifications (e.g., environmental or toxicology) are publicly associated with this specific product line.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls are low-risk consumer products across all brands because they are outdoor sporting goods with no ingestion or dermal absorption pathways. Honma D1 sits in the mid-to-premium performance segment and carries no known safety disadvantages compared to Titleist, Callaway, or TaylorMade equivalents. Material composition varies slightly by brand, but all use similar rubber-core and synthetic-cover chemistry with no established hazard differences.

If you buy it

Store balls in a cool, dry place to preserve cover integrity and performance; extreme heat (e.g., in a hot car) will not trigger chemical release but may degrade the cover faster. Inspect balls periodically for cracks or peeling; discard if cover is severely damaged, as this affects play, not safety. Wash with mild soap and water after use if desired; no special care is required. Golf balls are designed for outdoor use and are not a consumer chemical exposure concern.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

VOC or off-gassing from synthetic cover

Polyurethane and Surlyn covers are chemically stable at room and moderate temperatures. No off-gassing or VOC release has been reported for golf balls during storage or play.

None known

Heavy metal leaching from core or cover

Rubber-core golf balls do not use lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in standard formulations. No leaching pathway exists during normal outdoor use or skin contact.

Possible

Coating degradation or microparticle shedding

The synthetic cover may shed microscopic particles over years of use, especially if scuffed or damaged. This is not a safety hazard (particles are inert polymer) but a performance and environmental consideration; discard worn balls responsibly.

None known

Skin sensitization or allergic reaction on contact

No allergens, dyes, or sensitizing additives are typical in golf ball covers. Cases of contact dermatitis from handling golf balls are not established in medical literature or consumer reports.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More golf equipment & balls grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.