75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Honest Company Comfort Shampoo + Body Wash Sweet Cream

Honest Company · Body Wash

Honest Company Comfort Shampoo + Body Wash Sweet Cream

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; no chemical triggers, but no public PFAS testing or commitment.

Verdict: BuyMild surfactant blend with no established hazards; brand has transparent ingredient disclosure and third-party certifications, though PFAS commitment remains unstated.

Honest Company Comfort Shampoo + Body Wash is a liquid cosmetic with no known nonstick, water-resistant, or stain-resistant coatings, the primary risk vectors for PFAS in personal care. The brand makes no PFAS claims and has not disclosed third-party testing.

Shop Honest Company on Amazon →

Material

aqueous liquid blend (surfactants, water, botanical extracts)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Honest Company Comfort Shampoo + Body Wash is an aqueous liquid formulation based on mild surfactants (typically sodium lauryl sulfoacetate or similar gentle cleansers), water, and botanical extracts like oat and chamomile. Unlike bar soaps or solid cleansers, liquid formulations in squeeze bottles eliminate concerns about coating degradation or leaching from ceramic or metal surfaces. The botanical extract content is cosmetic rather than therapeutic, meaning they do not meaningfully alter safety risk but may appeal to consumers seeking plant-based messaging.

The brand's record and disclosure

Honest Company publishes full ingredient lists on its website and labels, which is standard transparency for the category. The brand holds USDA Organic certification for certain product lines and has marketed itself around ingredient safety and parental trust since its 2012 founding. No major recalls or regulatory action specific to this shampoo/body wash formulation are on public record. However, the brand has not published independent PFAS testing data or made a formal commitment to PFAS avoidance, leaving that hazard class unaddressed in their public safety communications.

How it compares in its category

Honest Company positions itself as a premium 'clean' brand versus mass-market alternatives like Johnson's Baby Wash or Dove. Most mainstream body washes and shampoos in the US market are formulated with similar mild anionic surfactants and carry comparable safety profiles for dermal contact. Honest Company's product is neither more nor less risky than competitors on the basis of material composition; differentiation is primarily brand positioning and ingredient sourcing (organic/botanical) rather than hazard reduction.

If you buy it

Liquid formulations require no special storage beyond keeping the cap sealed and away from direct sunlight to preserve botanical extracts; no heating or high-temperature use applies to this product. Use as directed on the label; rinse thoroughly after application. Check the ingredient list against any known personal fragrance allergens or sensitivities before initial use, as botanical extracts and fragrance compounds can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Store out of reach of children, as accidental ingestion of any body wash requires medical guidance.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance and botanical allergens

Formulation includes fragrance and plant extracts (oat, chamomile). While these are not toxic at typical dermal concentrations, fragrance compounds and botanical allergens are known triggers for contact dermatitis and sensitization in individuals with reactive skin or fragrance sensitivity. No specific allergen testing for this formulation is publicly available.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers (preservatives)

Liquid body wash formulations typically use preservatives such as phenoxyethanol or sodium benzoate rather than formaldehyde-releasing agents. Honest Company's public ingredient disclosures do not list methylchloroisothiazolinone, DMDM hydantoin, or other known formaldehyde releasers, suggesting this hazard class is not present in this product.

None known

Heavy metals in botanical or colorant additives

Botanical extracts and aqueous formulations carry theoretical risk of heavy metal accumulation if sourced from contaminated agricultural soil; however, no recalls or testing data indicating lead, cadmium, or other metals in Honest Company body wash products are on record. FDA oversight of cosmetic additives does not require pre-market heavy metal testing for botanical ingredients.

None known

Microplastic particulates

Liquid body wash formulations do not intentionally contain microbeads or plastic exfoliants. Honest Company does not market this product as exfoliating, and no microplastic content is evident from ingredient disclosure or public sources. Microplastic concern applies primarily to solid exfoliating scrubs and some solid cleansers.

Possible

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

1,4-dioxane is a contaminant sometimes present in cosmetic formulations as a byproduct of ethoxylation (surfactant manufacturing). Honest Company does not disclose 1,4-dioxane testing or removal steps in public statements. FDA does not mandate testing for this contaminant in finished products, so presence or absence cannot be confirmed without independent testing.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.