85/ 100
B
OverallD67/100
IceCoast Wax – Built for East Coast Ice with Added Control

Hertel · Ski Wax

IceCoast Wax – Built for East Coast Ice with Added Control

B · Low PFAS

Lower PFAS concern for ski wax; no specific risks identified, but no brand transparency on formulation.

Verdict: BuyHydrocarbon ski wax with no established non-PFAS hazards; lower toxicity profile typical of this category. Brand transparency is minimal but product class poses minimal consumer risk.

IceCoast is a hydrocarbon-based ski wax without known fluorinated additives, a traditional formulation category with lower inherent PFAS risk than fluoro-waxes. Hertel provides no public disclosure about PFAS content or avoidance. No third-party testing or certifications found.

Shop Hertel on Amazon →

Material

Hydrocarbon wax blend (ski/snowboard wax)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

IceCoast Wax is a hydrocarbon-based ski wax formulated for cold, icy conditions typical of eastern North American slopes. Hydrocarbon wax blends (paraffin, microcrystalline, and synthetic polymers) are the standard base for ski wax and are not known to leach toxic compounds during normal use on snow and ski bases. The "added control" formulation likely includes additives for glide and durability, but these remain undisclosed by Hertel.

The brand's record and disclosure

Hertel is a US-based ski wax manufacturer with decades in the market but maintains minimal public disclosure on formulation details or third-party testing. No recalls, safety incidents, or formal certifications (e.g., eco-labels, heavy-metal testing) are on record for this product. The brand's silence on PFAS is consistent with the broader ski wax industry, where water-repellency additives may include fluorinated compounds, but transparency remains low across most brands.

How it compares in its category

Ski wax as a product category carries lower inherent toxicity risk than many consumer goods because application is external (on ski bases, not ingested or worn against skin for hours) and quantities used are small. IceCoast sits in the mainstream hydrocarbon tier, similar to Swix and Toko waxes; some competitors market PFOA-free or fluorine-free alternatives, but Hertel does not highlight such claims. Most ski waxes are functionally similar in hazard profile regardless of brand.

If you buy it

Apply in well-ventilated areas; brief inhalation during ironing-on is low-risk but prolonged heating of any ski wax can release fumes. Store below 25°C (77°F) to prevent degradation and rancidity. Replace when glide performance drops noticeably, typically every 3-5 ski days or seasonally depending on use. Wash hands after application and avoid contact with eyes or mouth, as with any wax product.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) / thermal fume inhalation

Hydrocarbon waxes release vapors when heated during application (ironing onto ski base). Exposure is typically brief and low-volume for recreational users, but poor ventilation during repeated application could accumulate inhalation risk; no specific emissions data published by Hertel.

None known

Heavy metals in additives or pigments

No public reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy-metal contamination in ski waxes from Hertel or competitors. Hydrocarbon and synthetic polymer bases are not known accumulators of heavy metals, and color additives in wax are typically low-toxicity iron oxides or organic dyes.

Possible

Skin or eye irritation from direct contact

Molten or solid hydrocarbon wax can cause thermal burns if applied carelessly, and eye contact with wax particles could cause mechanical irritation. No chemical sensitizer is identified in the product class, but individual sensitivity to petroleum-derived wax components cannot be ruled out.

None known

Microplastic shedding or residue on snow/environment

Ski wax is designed to bond to the ski base and snow, not to shed or fragment during normal use. No published evidence suggests IceCoast or typical hydrocarbon waxes contribute meaningfully to microplastic pollution, though cumulative environmental impact of billions of wax applications globally remains under-studied.

Reported

Formulation opacity and lack of ingredient disclosure

Hertel does not disclose the full ingredient list or safety data sheets for IceCoast publicly. This is industry-standard practice but limits independent hazard assessment; the undefined additives for 'control' could include performance chemicals not yet evaluated for consumer safety.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Ski Wax

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

Start

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, non-fluoro wax avoids PFAS-laden fluorinated alternatives, but verify formulation transparency.

Risky category by default

Start Kick Wax Synthetic

Start

Kick Wax Synthetic

Synthetic hydrocarbon wax blend

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Synthetic ski wax lacks typical PFAS applications, but composition opacity warrants caution.

Risky category by default

Start Basewax

Start

Basewax

Wax-based product (beeswax, plant waxes, or mineral wax blend)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; wax-based products typically don't require PFAS, but verify ingredient list.

Risky category by default

More ski wax grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.