PFAS score
Hamilton Beach · Slow Cooker Liners
Hamilton Beach Slow Cooker Crock Pot Liner 990229300
Lower-concern option; ceramic liners avoid Teflon-type coating/PFOA, but Hamilton Beach has not publicly disclosed PFAS testing.
This is a removable ceramic-coated liner for a slow cooker, not a non-stick cookware piece with Teflon-type coating. Ceramic coatings typically do not contain Teflon-type coating or traditional PFAS, presenting lower concern than Teflon-type coating-coated cookware.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Ceramic-coated removable slow cooker liner
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Slow Cooker Liners
If You Care
Slow Cooking Liners
Unbleached parchment paper
Lower-concern choice; parchment-based liners with PFAS-free certification.
⚠Risky category by default
If You Care
Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners
silicone-free paper or parchment-based lining
Lower-concern choice; brand claims PFAS-free, but independent verification is absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More slow cooker liners grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.