PFAS score
Hamilton Beach · Slow Cooker Liners
Hamilton Beach 990077800 6 Quart Oval Slow Cooker Crock Pot Liner fits 33162 33165 33167 33262 33264 33463
Lower concern, ceramic crock liners avoid nonstick coatings, but Hamilton Beach makes no PFAS disclosure.
This is a replacement ceramic crock liner for Hamilton Beach slow cookers. Ceramic stoneware is not a known PFAS concern material. However, Hamilton Beach provides no public PFAS statement or testing data for this product, leaving durability coatings (if any) undisclosed. No third-party verification or PFAS-free claim is available.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Ceramic-coated stoneware crock liner
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Slow Cooker Liners
If You Care
Slow Cooking Liners
Unbleached parchment paper
Lower-concern choice; parchment-based liners with PFAS-free certification.
⚠Risky category by default
If You Care
Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners
silicone-free paper or parchment-based lining
Lower-concern choice; brand claims PFAS-free, but independent verification is absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More slow cooker liners grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.