Grover Cosmetics · Makeup
LWYA Gone In A Swipe Center Core Foundation
Lower-concern cosmetic; no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing, check ingredients list.
Center Core Foundation is a standard cosmetic product with no inherent PFAS-prone features like water-resistance or nonstick coatings. Grover Cosmetics makes no claims or disclosures about PFAS.
Shop Grover Cosmetics on Amazon →Material
Pigments, binders, silicones (typical foundation base)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This foundation uses pigments, binders, and silicones as its base, a typical modern formula structure. Pigments provide color and coverage; silicones improve spreadability and skin feel. The 'center core' designation suggests a pressed or compact format, which typically means added waxes or polymers for structure. Silicones themselves are chemically inert once applied, but the real concern is what's in the pigments and whether the formulation includes problematic preservatives or fragrance allergens.
The brand's record and disclosure
Grover Cosmetics has no widely documented safety controversies or major recalls on record for this product. However, the brand maintains silence on PFAS use and does not appear to publish ingredient sourcing transparency or third-party safety certifications. This lack of proactive disclosure is a yellow flag, not evidence of a problem, but a sign the brand has not prioritized openness about potential contaminants. Check the full ingredient list on packaging or the brand's website; if it is not available, that itself indicates weak transparency.
How it compares in its category
Foundation formulas across the category carry similar risks: pigment-borne heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers in preservatives, and fragrance allergens are industry-wide concerns, not unique to this brand. Grover sits in the mid-market segment, so it typically uses conventional preservatives and pigments rather than natural alternatives (which carry their own risks). Major brands like MAC and Estee Lauder publish more detailed ingredient lists and have formal safety protocols; indie brands often test for heavy metals. Grover's transparency falls between these poles, making it a middle-ground choice.
If you buy it
Patch test on inner arm or jaw 24 hours before full application to catch fragrance or preservative sensitivity. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as silicone-based formulas can break down slightly if exposed to high temperatures for prolonged periods. Discard after 12 months of opening; cosmetics are prone to bacterial growth once exposed to air and moisture. If you experience redness, itching, or stinging that does not resolve within 10 minutes of application, stop use and review the ingredient list for known allergens.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)
Foundation pigments sourced from iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and colorants can sometimes contain trace heavy metals depending on ore origin and refining. Grover does not publish heavy metal testing data, so risk cannot be ruled out but is not documented as reported either.
Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Foundations commonly use preservatives like DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea, which release formaldehyde over time. No public documentation exists of Grover using these; check the ingredient list for their presence before purchase.
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Many foundations, including conventional silicone-based formulas, contain fragrance compounds that trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals. If the product lists 'fragrance' or 'parfum' without disclosure of specific compounds, this is a documented risk in the category.
Talc contamination (if talc is an ingredient)
This product's ingredient list is not publicly detailed enough to confirm whether talc is present. If the formula does not list talc, this hazard is not relevant; if it does, verify third-party talc purity testing, as cosmetic-grade talc can carry asbestos.
Silicone buildup and skin barrier irritation
Silicone-heavy foundations can occlude skin pores if not removed thoroughly with makeup remover. This is not an acute toxicity risk but can trigger acne or dermatitis in prone individuals; daily cleansing is essential.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More makeup grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.