75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
GOJO Foaming Soap Refill Unscented 23.6 oz. 4/Carton

Gojo · Hand Soap

GOJO Foaming Soap Refill Unscented 23.6 oz. 4/Carton

C · Moderate

Lower concern, foaming soap is unlikely to contain PFAS, but GOJO does not publicly disclose.

Verdict: BuyWater-based foaming soap with standard surfactants; no established safety concerns reported for this product or material class.

GOJO's unscented foaming soap is a simple water-based product with no obvious PFAS risk drivers (no waterproofing, stain-resistance, or nonstick coatings). However, the brand makes no public statement about PFAS-free status or ingredient transparency.

Shop Gojo on Amazon →

Material

Water-based foaming soap (surfactants, water, glycerin)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

GOJO Foaming Soap Refill is a water-based formulation containing surfactants (cleaning agents), glycerin (humectant), and water as primary ingredients. The foaming mechanism relies on mechanical aeration rather than chemical propellants, which reduces exposure risk. No intentional biocides, formaldehyde releasers, or fragrance allergens are listed for the unscented variant, making it chemically straightforward compared to many consumer soaps.

The brand's record and disclosure

GOJO Industries (maker of Purell and GOJO soaps) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition or third-party safety testing for all product lines. The company has faced no major recalls or safety violations on record for this foaming soap line. GOJO maintains some sustainability certifications but remains silent on PFAS presence across its portfolio, which is typical for the soap category but represents a transparency gap.

How it compares in its category

Foaming hand soaps like this are generally considered safer than antimicrobial or heavily fragranced alternatives because they use fewer additives and no active antimicrobials (triclosan, etc.). This unscented version avoids fragrance allergen risks that plague scented soaps. It sits at the low end of chemical complexity for commercial hand soaps, comparable to simple bar soaps but in liquid form.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the dispenser; foaming formulations require less product per use, reducing consumption. Store sealed refills away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent degradation, though this product is not heat-sensitive. Check dispenser cleanliness monthly to prevent bacterial biofilm buildup in the pump mechanism. No special handling needed; standard hand soap precautions apply (avoid eye contact, keep out of reach of young children).

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Fragrance allergens

This is the unscented variant, so fragrance-induced contact dermatitis or sensitization is not a concern. Scented versions of similar GOJO soaps may carry fragrance allergen risk, but this SKU explicitly avoids that.

None known

Antimicrobial residue or bioaccumulation

No triclosan, triclocarban, or other antimicrobial agents are documented in GOJO foaming soap formulations. Standard surfactant-based soaps do not bioaccumulate in skin or organs.

Possible

Dispenser/container leachables

Plastic dispenser pumps on refill cartons may leach trace BPA or other plasticizers if stored at elevated temperatures or for extended periods, though the risk is low for a water-based product in normal conditions. No specific testing data on GOJO dispensers is publicly available.

Possible

Skin irritation from surfactants

All surfactant-based soaps can cause mild irritation or drying in sensitive individuals; unscented formulations reduce chemical load but do not eliminate this risk. Glycerin inclusion helps mitigate drying.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth in pump/dispenser

Standing water in pump mechanisms can harbor biofilm if dispensers are not cleaned regularly. This is a maintenance issue, not a product defect, but applies to all pump-dispensed soaps.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Hand Soap

Ecos Orange Hand Soap

Ecos

Orange Hand Soap

Plant-based surfactants, water, essential oils (orange)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, solid plant-based formula with credible third-party oversight; no PFAS-prone materials.

EPA Safer ChoiceLeaping BunnyEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Seventh Generation Hand Wash, Free Clean

Seventh Generation

Hand Wash, Free Clean

aqueous surfactants, botanicals, water-based formula

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; buy with confidence if skin-sensitivity is a priority.

MADE SAFEEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Seventh Generation Liquid Hand Soap Free & Clean

Seventh Generation

Liquid Hand Soap Free & Clean

Water-based liquid soap formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; no PFAS expected in liquid soap format, but verification limited to brand claims.

Seventh Generation Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More hand soap grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.