70/ 100
C
OverallF48/100
Glossier Makeup

Glossier · Cosmetics

Glossier Makeup

C · Moderate
Verdict: Buy with careGlossier cosmetics lack full ingredient transparency and PFAS status remains unclear; use with awareness of fragrance and pigment sourcing.

Mixed — limited disclosure. This is a model-based estimate from materials and available data, not a lab test.

Shop Glossier on Amazon →

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Glossier's makeup formulations typically contain talc or talc-free mineral bases, emollients (silicones or plant oils), iron oxides and mica for pigmentation, and fragrance blends. The brand has not published full chemical composition or third-party safety testing summaries for individual SKUs. Talc sourcing and fragrance allergen disclosure remain opaque across their product range.

The brand's record and disclosure

Glossier does not publish ingredient safety certifications (e.g., EU banned substance lists, heavy metal testing) on consumer-facing materials. The brand markets itself as 'clean beauty' but has not independently verified PFAS-free status or conducted disclosed dermal sensitization trials. No recalls or regulatory actions against Glossier cosmetics are on public record in the US or EU, but their transparency record is below industry leaders like Beautycounter or Ilia.

How it compares in its category

Glossier sits in the premium indie-beauty tier where ingredient disclosure varies widely. Most direct competitors (Rare Beauty, Rhode Beauty) similarly lack full formulation transparency. Brands with certified clean formulations (Kosas, RMS Beauty) undergo stricter third-party vetting and publish heavy metal and PFAS test results; Glossier does not.

If you buy it

Patch test new products on inner arm 48 hours before full application, especially if you have fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis. Avoid contact with eyes and broken skin. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment or emollient degradation. Discard if color, smell, or texture changes unexpectedly, or after 12 months of opening.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Talc contamination and respirable mineral risk

Glossier does not publicly disclose talc-free certification or asbestos testing for any products using talc. Historical contamination in talc deposits remains a regulatory concern; products applied near lips or inhaled (powders, blush) carry low but non-zero risk if talc sourcing is unvetted.

Reported

Fragrance allergen disclosure gaps

Glossier lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without naming constituent allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool, eugenol). Consumers with known fragrance sensitivities cannot assess safety before purchase; EU regulations require allergen labeling, but US does not.

Possible

Heavy metals in iron oxide and mica pigments

Iron oxides and mica used in Glossier eyeshadows, blushes, and foundations are not independently tested for lead, cadmium, or arsenic on published materials. The brand does not provide ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) test certificates that are standard for premium color cosmetics.

None known

Formaldehyde releaser preservatives

No evidence that Glossier uses DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in current formulations, though ingredient lists do not always distinguish preservative type.

Possible

1,4-dioxane in emulsifiers or surfactants

Glossier does not disclose whether emulsifiers are 1,4-dioxane-free or vacuum-stripped. This contaminant is possible in polysorbates and PEG compounds but not disclosed without detailed material safety data sheets.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 100% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Cosmetics

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

bareMinerals

Mineral Makeup

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Risky category by default

Ilia Beauty Clean Makeup

Ilia Beauty

Clean Makeup

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Risky category by default

RMS Beauty Organic Makeup

RMS Beauty

Organic Makeup

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More cosmetics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.