Geo. F. Trumper's · Shaving Cream
Geo F. Trumper Eucris Shaving Cream
Lower PFAS concern, traditional shaving cream with no known fluorochemistry or water-resistant treatment needs.
Geo. F. Trumper's Eucris is a conventional glycerin-based shaving cream with no disclosed water-repellency, stain resistance, or nonstick coatings that would typically require PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims (silent stance).
Shop Geo. F. Trumper's on Amazon →Material
soap and glycerin cream
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Eucris is a soap-and-glycerin cream formulation typical of old-school British shaving creams, not a modern synthetic gel or foam. The base is saponified fats (soap), glycerin (humectant), and water with fragrance oils, chemically straightforward and not prone to the contamination risks of plastic-dependent or heavily processed alternatives. No Teflon-type coating (Teflon), silicones, or water-resistant coatings are used, eliminating several common synthetic hazards in personal care.
The brand's record and disclosure
Geo. F. Trumper's is a London barber-supply house established 1875 with a reputation for traditional formulations and minimal reformulation. The brand does not publicly disclose full ingredient lists or pursue third-party certifications (e.g., EWG, Natural/Organic), but this reflects older industry practice rather than secrecy. No recalls, toxicity complaints, or regulatory actions are on record for this product or line.
How it compares in its category
Cream shaving products like Eucris sit between modern synthetic gels (higher VOC and plasticizer risk) and aerosol foams (propellant and Teflon-type coating exposure). Eucris's soap-glycerin formula is simpler and lower-contamination than most contemporary creams, which often include silicones, parabens, or synthetic thickeners. It is comparable in safety profile to other European artisanal cream brands (e.g., Tabac, Taylor of Old Bond Street).
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place; soap-based creams are stable and do not require refrigeration but degrade if exposed to prolonged heat or moisture. Use a clean brush or fingertip to avoid introducing bacteria into the jar. A tin lasts several months with daily use; replace if you notice separation, off-odors, or mold growth (rare but possible in very humid bathrooms). No special precautions needed beyond standard soap handling.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens
Eucris is heavily fragrant (signature lavender-based scent). No disclosure of fragrance component breakdown; individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance allergies may experience contact dermatitis or respiratory irritation. Patch test recommended for sensitive users.
Formaldehyde releasers
No preservative system or ingredient profile published to suggest formaldehyde donors (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin). Traditional soap-glycerin creams rely on low water activity and antimicrobial soap properties; risk is low but unverified by public third-party testing.
Heavy metals in pigments
Eucris is an off-white cream with minimal added colorants. No lead, cadmium, or chromium contamination is documented; risk is minimal given simple formulation and UK manufacturing standards.
Bacterial or mold growth (in-use contamination)
Jar format with no pump or airless closure creates risk of bacterial contamination if shared, double-dipped, or stored in very humid conditions. Proper hygiene (clean applicator, dry storage) mitigates risk substantially.
1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct)
No published analysis available; risk is theoretical rather than documented. Simple glycerin and soap base with minimal surfactant processing suggests low probability, but lack of transparency limits certainty.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Shaving Cream
Baxter of California
Barbe Set
Stainless steel, brushes, standard cosmetic packaging
Lower concern, standard grooming tools with no known PFAS indicators, though brand discloses nothing.
✓Bare metal or glass, no coating at all
Kiehl's
Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief
Stainless steel blade; gel/cream formula (water, glycerin, botanical extracts)
Lower PFAS concern, standard razor and aftercare gel with no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing.
⚠Risky category by default
Aesop
Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion
water-based serum and lotion emulsions in glass/plastic bottles
Lower PFAS concern for this leave-on cosmetic; no special coatings flagged.
⚠Risky category by default
More shaving cream grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.