65/ 100
D
OverallF43/100
Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer Briefs

Gap · Waterproof Sports & Performance Undergarments

Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer Briefs

D · Elevated

Lower concern; no water repellency treatment claimed or disclosed.

Verdict: SkipPolyester/nylon blend with no water-repellency claim limits PFAS exposure; standard synthetic underwear with manageable hazard profile.

Performance boxer briefs with synthetic moisture-wicking fabric. No waterproofing, stain resistance, or water-repellent coating treatment mentioned, reducing typical PFAS risk from athletic wear. Brand silent on PFAS; verify fabric sourcing if concerned.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon blend performance fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Go-Dry Cool Boxer Briefs are a polyester/nylon blend engineered for moisture-wicking and quick-dry performance, typical of activewear fabrics. These synthetics are inherently non-toxic in their base polymer form, but the finishing process (dyes, antimicrobial treatments, elastic components) introduces the primary concern window. The absence of any stated water-repellent or stain-guard coating is a safety advantage, as it rules out common PFAS water-repellency treatments found in premium performance wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Gap Inc. maintains a sustainability website but has not published detailed chemical inventory or restricted substance lists specific to standard apparel lines like Old Navy basics. The brand has faced scrutiny over fast-fashion supply-chain practices but no major chemical hazard recalls have been documented for Old Navy basics in recent years. Disclosure on antimicrobial or flame-retardant finishes is not prominent; this silence is typical for budget activewear but means you cannot verify which production methods or additives were used.

How it compares in its category

Budget performance underwear (Old Navy, Target, Walmart lines) typically relies on low-cost polyester-nylon blends with minimal finishing versus premium brands like Lululemon or Patagonia, which publish chemical restrictions and certifications. Old Navy's Go-Dry line occupies the middle: affordable enough to replace frequently (reducing cumulative chemical exposure) but not certified organic or bluesign-compliant. Compared to cotton boxer briefs, synthetics eliminate moisture-rot risk but carry dye and synthetic polymer finish concerns; the trade-off is neutral from a hazard standpoint if washed properly.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water before first wear to rinse loose dyes and finishes; warm water is safe for routine laundering and does not degrade polyester-nylon at normal temperatures. Avoid fabric softeners and bleach, which can degrade elastic and coating integrity over time. Replace after 50-80 washes or when elastic loses recovery, as degraded elastic may shed microfibers more readily. Do not expose to direct high heat (dryer on high, iron) as nylon can melt; air dry or low-heat tumble dry.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Polyester fabrics in budget activewear typically use azo dyes; Old Navy does not disclose dye chemistry or heavy metal content in dyes. Pre-wash rinsing can reduce loose dye migration, but risk of dermal sensitization exists in sensitive individuals.

Possible

Antimicrobial finishes (unspecified)

Go-Dry moisture-wicking claims suggest antimicrobial treatment, but Old Navy does not disclose whether silver nanoparticles, triclosan, or other agents are used. Such finishes may leach during wash; composition is not publicly available.

Reported

Microplastic shedding

Polyester-nylon blends are documented to shed microfibers during washing. Old Navy products have not been specifically tested, but the material class is known to contribute to laundry water microplastic loads; use a microfiber-catching wash bag to reduce shedding.

None known

Elastic and trim heavy metals

Elastic cores and metal fasteners in underwear can contain nickel or cadmium; no recalls or testing data specific to Old Navy Go-Dry have been published, but direct skin contact warrants pre-wash and monitoring for irritation.

Possible

Formaldehyde in fabric finishing

Polyester wrinkle-resistance and durable-press finishes sometimes use formaldehyde resins; Old Navy does not disclose use. Off-gassing risk is low post-manufacturing but pre-wash is prudent for sensitive individuals.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.