65/ 100
D

PFAS score

Fox River Men's Explorer Wick-Dry Socks

Fox River · Performance Socks

Fox River Men's Explorer Wick-Dry Socks

D · Elevated

Lower concern; conventional sock with no known PFAS-prone treatments, but no transparency on moisture-wicking chemistry.

Fox River Explorer socks are primarily merino wool and synthetic fibers without any disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments that typically trigger PFAS use. The brand does not mention PFAS or make any related claims.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Merino wool blend, acrylic, nylon; no Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating disclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More performance socks grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.