20/ 100
F

PFAS score

Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves

Fjallraven · Winter Gloves

Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves

F · High PFAS

Skip until Fjallraven discloses water-repellent coating chemistry, wool gloves don't need PFAS-based repellency.

Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves feature a water-resistant finish, but Fjallraven does not publicly disclose whether it uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments. Wool and wool blends can be made water-repellent without fluorochemicals; the absence of transparency is the concern, not the material itself.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Wool blend with water-repellent coating water-resistant treatment (composition unspecified by Fjallraven)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Winter Gloves

Patagonia Synchilla Gloves

Patagonia

Synchilla Gloves

Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern for core fleece; verify any water-repellent finish separately with Patagonia.

Risky category by default

Icebreaker Quantum Gloves

Icebreaker

Quantum Gloves

Merino wool blend, likely uncoated or standard knit

D
D · Elevated

Lower-concern baseline for wool gloves; no known PFAS triggers, but Icebreaker has not publicly disclosed water-repellent coating treatment details.

Risky category by default

Icebreaker 260 Tech Glove Liner

Icebreaker

260 Tech Glove Liner

Merino wool blend, likely polyester base

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern; natural fiber liner without known water-resistant treatment, but brand transparency is absent.

Risky category by default

More winter gloves grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.