75/ 100
C
OverallC71/100
Eucerin Gel pH5

Eucerin · Body Wash

Eucerin Gel pH5

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; typical skincare gel with no known water-repellent or coating additives.

Verdict: BuyEucerin Gel pH5 is a dermatologist-developed cleanser with no established hazards; low PFAS concern and solid brand transparency make it a safe choice.

Eucerin Gel pH5 is a rinse-off cosmetic (facial gel cleanser/hydrator) containing water, glycerin, and skin conditioning agents, not formulated with Teflon-family coating, Teflon-type coating, or water-repellent coating chemistry.

Shop Eucerin on Amazon →

Material

aqueous gel base with humectants and skin-care actives

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Eucerin Gel pH5 is a water-based gel cleanser formulated with glycerin and other humectants to hydrate while cleansing. The pH 5 formulation is designed to match skin acidity and minimize irritation. No known problematic ingredients such as parabens at concern levels, formaldehyde releasers, or talc contamination have been documented in this product line. The aqueous gel base is chemically simple and typical of modern dermatological body washes.

The brand's record and disclosure

Eucerin (Beiersdorf) is a pharmaceutical-grade skincare brand with strong dermatological credibility and transparent ingredient labeling. The brand regularly discloses full ingredient lists and has a documented history of formulation safety oversight. No significant recalls or safety controversies have been established for Eucerin body washes. The brand's silence on PFAS is consistent with the category norm; body washes do not require water-repellent coatings that would justify PFAS use.

How it compares in its category

Eucerin Gel pH5 sits in the premium dermatological cleanser segment, positioned as safer than mass-market body washes that may contain more fragrance allergens or antimicrobial agents. It is comparable in safety profile to Cetaphil and CeraVe cleansers, all three emphasizing pH-neutral or slightly acidic formulations. This product avoids the cost-cutting additives sometimes found in budget alternatives, making it a lower-risk choice within body washes.

If you buy it

Use as directed on intact skin; no special precautions needed beyond standard body wash guidance. Store in a cool, dry place and discard if the product separates or smells off, though the sealed packaging and preservative system make this unlikely. The product requires no maintenance and does not degrade over time in normal use. Discontinue use only if individual sensitivity develops, which is rare with this formulation.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Eucerin Gel pH5 contains fragrance compounds, which can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. However, the formulation is designed for sensitive skin, and fragrance levels are typically moderate compared to mass-market body washes.

None known

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing impurity)

No documented detections of 1,4-dioxane in Eucerin body washes. The brand's use of pharmaceutical-grade manufacturing standards makes this impurity unlikely, though it is theoretically possible in ethoxylated ingredients used as surfactants.

None known

Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives have been reported in this product. Eucerin typically uses safer preservative systems such as phenoxyethanol or potassium sorbate, avoiding releasers associated with dermatitis.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants

Eucerin Gel pH5 uses minimal colorants, and no heavy metal contamination in pigments has been reported. The product's clear or light gel consistency suggests use of approved, well-regulated colorant systems if any are present.

None known

Microplastic exfoliants

This is a non-scrubbing gel cleanser without exfoliating beads or microplastic particles. Formulation does not include intentional microplastics or natural exfoliants that shed microparticles.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.