40/ 100
F
OverallF18/100
Outdoor Products SmartPhone Watertight Phone Case

Etuui · Waterproof Personal Electronics Cases

Outdoor Products SmartPhone Watertight Phone Case

F · High PFAS

Skip until brand discloses waterproof treatment chemistry.

Verdict: SkipPlastic case with undisclosed waterproof coating poses unknown chemical risk; acceptable only if kept away from skin contact and food, pending brand transparency on treatment chemistry.

Waterproof phone cases commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings, but Etuui provides no material or treatment disclosure. Insufficient transparency to assess PFAS risk.

The safe swap

Spigen Cryo Armor Case for iPhone 15 Pro Max

Spigen

Spigen Cryo Armor Case for iPhone 15 Pro Max

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Plastic case with unspecified waterproof coating/sealing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This case is a plastic shell with an unspecified waterproof coating or sealing system. The base plastic is likely polycarbonate or TPU (thermoplastic urethane), both common in phone protection. The waterproof treatment is the critical unknown: manufacturers often use PFAS-based hydrophobic coatings (like Teflon-type coating), silicone sealants, or polyurethane elastomers. Without disclosure from Etuui, you cannot confirm whether the coating contains fluorinated compounds, which would affect skin and environmental exposure risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Etuui has published no accessible material safety documentation, ingredient lists, or waterproof treatment chemistry for this product. There are no documented safety certifications (such as ISO, CE, or third-party material testing) on record for this brand in consumer safety databases. The silence on waterproof treatment is particularly concerning given widespread industry use of PFAS in such coatings. Without a public stance on chemical transparency, this brand does not meet baseline disclosure standards expected of established phone accessory manufacturers.

How it compares in its category

Phone cases range widely in waterproof approach: some use sealed gaskets and silicone, others rely on coated plastic, and premium brands often disclose their chemistry. Etuui's case lacks the transparency of competitors who publicly state 'PFAS-free' or specify coating type. Most major phone case brands (OtterBox, Spigen, Pelican) provide material specifications; Etuui's silence suggests either use of standard PFAS treatments without labeling, or reluctance to market a less durable alternative. This puts it below-average for consumer trust in this category.

If you buy it

Limit skin contact with the exterior coating, especially for children and during warm weather (heat can increase leaching). Do not use for food storage, as the coating may migrate into moisture. Inspect the case monthly for cracking or peeling, which would increase direct contact with bare plastic and accelerate degradation. Store in a cool, dry place; avoid prolonged sun exposure or contact with solvents (alcohol hand sanitizer, acetone), which can degrade the waterproof layer and expose underlying plastic.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Waterproof coating composition (likely PFAS or alternative unknown)

Etuui does not disclose whether the waterproof treatment uses PFAS-based Teflon-family coating, silicone, or polyurethane. Given industry prevalence of PFAS in phone coatings and the brand's silence, PFAS presence is plausible but unconfirmed. Skin contact and environmental release are the primary exposure routes.

None known

Plastic leaching (BPA/BPS) from base material

The base plastic (likely polycarbonate or TPU) may contain trace BPA or BPS if not explicitly stated as BPA-free. No documented recalls or violations exist for Etuui cases, but absence of certification means no assurance of safe plastic formulation.

Reported

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Phone cases with applied coatings can peel or crack with use, shedding microparticles of plastic and coating material. If the waterproof layer is polymer-based, degradation will accelerate leaching of coating chemicals into the microenvironment (pocket, hand, water in contact with case).

Possible

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from sealing compounds

Some waterproof sealants and adhesives used in case assembly emit low levels of VOCs during initial use or storage. Etuui provides no offgassing specification or cure guidance, so new cases may carry a mild chemical odor that indicates incomplete curing or use of solvent-based coatings.

Possible

Skin sensitization from undisclosed additives in coating

Waterproof coatings often contain catalysts, plasticizers, or antimicrobial agents that can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Without a full ingredient disclosure, risk of allergic reaction cannot be quantified; individuals with known polyurethane or silicone sensitivity should avoid prolonged contact.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Personal Electronics Cases

Spigen Cryo Armor Case for iPhone 15 Pro Max

Spigen

Cryo Armor Case for iPhone 15 Pro Max

TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) bumper with polycarbonate back panel

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; standard phone case materials lack obvious PFAS indicators.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Galaxy S26 Series Mag Fit Case

Spigen

Galaxy S26 Series Mag Fit Case

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polycarbonate

B
F
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern phone case, no known PFAS risk identified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Ghostek Nautical Slim Case for MagSafe for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Samsung

Ghostek Nautical Slim Case for MagSafe for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Polycarbonate and TPU blend (typical phone case polymers)

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; rigid phone cases rarely use PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof personal electronics cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.