PFAS score
Estée Lauder Double Wear · Lipstick
Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay In Place Lipstick Dwl 10 Stay Scarlet
Skip until Estée Lauder discloses waterproofing chemistry, no public PFAS assurance for this long-wear formula.
Double Wear Stay In Place is formulated to be waterproof and long-wearing, which typically requires water-resistant coatings in cosmetics. Estée Lauder does not publicly disclose whether this product uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free waterproofing agents.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Pigments, waxes, silicones, polymeric film-formers (unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Lipstick
MAC Fix+
MAC Frost Lipstick
wax, oils, pigments, emollients (typical lipstick base)
Lower concern; typical lipstick formula unlikely to contain PFAS, but MAC does not disclose.
⚠Risky category by default
MAC Fix+
MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set
liquid/cream lipstick with standard pigments and emollients
Lower concern, typical cosmetic formula with no known PFAS drivers, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
NARS
Powermatte Lipstick
Pigments, waxes, oils in standard lipstick base
Lower-concern cosmetic; no known PFAS triggers, but brand makes no transparency claims.
⚠Risky category by default
More lipstick grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.