PFAS score
Ere Perez · Eyeliner
ere Perez Eye Pencil
Lower-risk cosmetic, but waterproof claims warrant caution until brand clarifies ingredients.
Ere Perez Eye Pencil is a color cosmetic with no public PFAS disclosure or third-party verification. Eye pencils marketed as waterproof may contain PFAS-based water-resistance coatings, though many use silicones or wax alternatives.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Wax, pigments, and binders; waterproofing mechanism unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Eyeliner
MAC
Chromaline Gel - Hi-Def Cyan
gel pigment formulation (primary ingredients not publicly disclosed for proprietary reasons)
Lower concern, but cosmetic formulation opacity limits certainty.
⚠Risky category by default
Ere Perez
Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)
Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (typical pencil formulation)
Lower-concern cosmetic; no PFAS risk signals identified, but brand provides no transparency on formulation or PFAS stance.
⚠Risky category by default
Ere Perez
JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black
Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (natural eye pencil formulation)
Lower PFAS concern; natural cosmetic formulation unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but brand transparency absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More eyeliner grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.