Dunlop · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Dunlop Digitech All Weather Golf Glove Mens Left Large Dupont Coolmax
Golf glove with water-repellent treatment; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.
Dunlop does not publicly disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating chemistry. All-weather golf gloves typically use water-repellent coatings that may contain legacy PFAS, though modern alternatives exist.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
DuPont Coolmax polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This glove is constructed from DuPont Coolmax, a polyester microfiber blend engineered for moisture-wicking and breathability in athletic wear. The glove includes a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface to shed water on the golf course. water-repellent coating coatings historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some manufacturers now use PFAS-free alternatives; Dunlop has not disclosed which type is used here. Polyester itself is stable and poses minimal leaching risk under normal wear conditions.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dunlop is a subsidiary of Sumitomo Rubber Industries and produces sporting goods globally with no public record of major textile safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye violations. The brand does not publish detailed material safety disclosures, restricted substance lists, or PFAS commitments on its website or product labeling. No independent certifications (such as Oeko-Tex Standard 100) are mentioned for this glove model. Dunlop's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical for sports-apparel brands but leaves end-user PFAS exposure unquantified.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a niche apparel subcategory with fewer safety certifications and public scrutiny than mainstream athletic wear. Most branded golf gloves (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade) similarly lack PFAS transparency on water-repellent coating treatments. Polyester-based construction is standard; Coolmax microfiber is considered a premium, non-toxic variant. This product sits in the mid-to-premium tier for golf gloves and carries typical water-repellent coating opacity risks common across the segment.
If you buy it
Hand-wash in cool water and mild detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating and avoid accelerating any finish breakdown. Do not machine wash, bleach, or dry-clean, as these can compromise the water-repellent layer and potentially release coated particles. Replace when the grip degrades or water no longer beads on the palm surface, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. Store in a dry location; mold or mildew is a greater practical risk than chemical leaching during normal use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Azo dyes (colorfast toxins)
No recalls or reports of banned azo dyes in Dunlop golf gloves. Polyester gloves dyed with standard commercial colorants are unlikely to migrate onto skin under normal sweating and wear, but no independent testing of this glove model is on record.
Formaldehyde resins (wrinkle/shrink treatment)
Coolmax polyester does not typically require formaldehyde-releasing resins for finishing. No formaldehyde complaints have been reported for Dunlop golf gloves in public records.
Antimony in polyester fiber
Antimony trioxide is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and can leach in trace amounts. No known reports of antimony leaching from Dunlop or other golf glove brands; skin contact during short, intermittent use poses negligible exposure risk.
water-repellent coating particle shedding and inhalation
As the water-repellent coating finish degrades over time, small coated particles may shed into the hand and potentially be inhaled if the glove is handled roughly or stored near the face. The specific composition (PFAS vs. PFAS-free) is undisclosed, so particle risk profile cannot be fully assessed.
Skin sensitization or irritation from finish or dyes
No documented cases of contact dermatitis or allergic reactions linked to Dunlop golf gloves. Polyester and standard water-repellent coating treatments are generally well-tolerated, but individual sensitivity varies. Patch-test on a small area of skin if you have sensitive hands.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.