75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Drunk Elephant Umbra Sheer Mineral Cream SPF 30

Drunk Elephant · Sunscreen

Drunk Elephant Umbra Sheer Mineral Cream SPF 30

C · Moderate

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen; no known PFAS risk, but brand silent on PFAS practices.

Verdict: BuyMineral sunscreen with zinc oxide and titanium dioxide carries minimal established hazards; brand transparency is weak but product chemistry is inherently lower-risk.

Drunk Elephant's Umbra uses mineral UV filters (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), which are inherently lower-PFAS-risk ingredients. The product contains no water-resistant film-forming coatings or grease-resistant treatments typical of PFAS-laden cosmetics.

Shop Drunk Elephant on Amazon →

Material

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide) in cream base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Umbra Sheer uses zinc oxide and titanium dioxide as UV filters, the two mineral actives approved by the FDA that sit on skin rather than absorbing into it. The cream base likely contains glycerin, oils, and emulsifiers typical of luxury sunscreens; these are inert and pose no known safety concern. Mineral filters are physically opaque and do not degrade into problematic byproducts under UV exposure the way some chemical sunscreens do. The main user complaint with mineral sunscreens is white cast and texture, not safety.

The brand's record and disclosure

Drunk Elephant markets itself as a clean beauty brand emphasizing ingredient transparency, but does not publish detailed PFAS-avoidance statements or third-party certifications (EWG Verified, NSF, etc.). The brand has faced criticism for vague marketing claims and premium pricing that does not always align with ingredient novelty. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product line. Their sunscreen portfolio lacks public commitment to PFAS-free formulation, though mineral sunscreens are inherently lower-risk.

How it compares in its category

Mineral sunscreens as a category are considered safer than chemical alternatives by dermatologists and the EWG because they do not absorb systemically and avoid degradation byproducts. Drunk Elephant's version sits in the luxury price tier (typically $45-65) alongside brands like Blue Lizard and La Roche-Posay, which offer similar or better transparency. Budget mineral alternatives like Neutrogena Ultra Sheer or Coppertone Pure & Simple offer equivalent active ingredients at 5-10x lower cost but often worse sensory profiles. This product's positioning is premium marketing on a material class that is inherently lower-risk.

If you buy it

Apply generously (quarter-teaspoon face, full ounce body) 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapply every two hours or after water contact. Store in a cool, dry place; heat will not degrade mineral filters but may soften the cream base. Discontinue if irritation or photosensitivity appears, though zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are rarely allergenic. No special maintenance required; the product does not require regular replacement unless separated or expired (typically 3 years unopened).

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Titanium dioxide (nano vs. non-nano particle size)

Drunk Elephant does not disclose whether titanium dioxide in this product is nano-scale. Non-nano particles are considered safe; nano particles raise inhalation concerns if aerosolized during application, though skin application risk is minimal. No established harm from sunscreen-use levels in cosmetics, but transparency on particle size is absent.

Possible

Fragrance/fragrance allergens

The product likely contains fragrance or essential oils (Drunk Elephant markets scent profile), but the brand does not disclose fragrance ingredients or allergen statements. Fragrance can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; mineral sunscreens do not require fragrance for efficacy. Full ingredient list would clarify, but this is not publicly detailed in standard marketing materials

None known

Emulsifier and thickener irritation or sensitization

Cream-base ingredients (likely cetyl alcohol, stearic acid, common emulsifiers) are standard across dermatologist-recommended sunscreens and carry no known safety flags. No recalls or adverse reports specific to Drunk Elephant sunscreen formulations on record.

Possible

Preservative system safety (if synthetic)

Drunk Elephant does not disclose preservatives in public marketing; common options include phenoxyethanol or methylisothiazolinone, both safe at cosmetic use levels but potential contact allergens for hypersensitive skin. The brand's 'clean' positioning may suggest gentler preservatives, but this is not confirmed.

None known

Zinc oxide skin irritation or occlusion risk

Zinc oxide is generally safe and non-irritating even for sensitive skin; it does not occlude pores in mineral sunscreen formulations at typical SPF 30 concentrations. No specific adverse reports for this product exist in consumer safety databases.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen with credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; mineral sunscreen with third-party verification and no known fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern choice; mineral sunscreen + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs reduce risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.