75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Dial Professional Foam Hand Sanitizer 06040

Dial · Hand Sanitizer

Dial Professional Foam Hand Sanitizer 06040

C · Moderate

Lower concern for PFAS in use, but Dial makes no transparency claims.

Verdict: BuyAqueous foam sanitizer with no established hazards beyond PFAS (75/100); safe for intended use with normal hand washing practices.

Dial Professional Foam Hand Sanitizer is a liquid cosmetic product with no known fluorinated coatings, nonstick treatments, or water-resistant finishes, categories where PFAS are typically intentional. The brand does not disclose PFAS information or hold third-party certifications.

Shop Dial on Amazon →

Material

aqueous foam hand sanitizer formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dial Professional Foam Hand Sanitizer 06040 is a water-based (aqueous) formulation, typically containing ethyl alcohol as the active antimicrobial agent, along with emulsifiers, thickeners, and preservatives to stabilize the foam. Unlike alcohol gels, foaming sanitizers use less active ingredient per dose because the mechanical action of foam increases surface contact; the aqueous base means no volatile organic solvent carriers and lower inhalation risk. The formula is designed for frequent use in healthcare and food service settings where skin tolerance is a practical concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dial (owned by Henkel) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, preservative systems, or PFAS testing for this product line. The brand has not faced major recalls or documented controversies tied to hand sanitizer safety, though broader scrutiny of hand sanitizer products emerged post-2020 regarding methanol contamination in some competitors. Dial does not market antimicrobial or dermatologist certifications for this foam product, positioning it as a functional workplace sanitizer rather than a premium consumer brand.

How it compares in its category

Foaming hand sanitizers occupy a middle ground: they use less alcohol per application than gel products (typically 60-65% vs. 70%) but still meet FDA antimicrobial efficacy standards. Dial Professional's aqueous base is safer than alcohol-based gels for environments where workers handle sensitive items or have frequent skin exposure; it dries faster than non-alcohol foam alternatives and carries lower fire risk than pure alcohol formulations. Compared to bar soap, it requires no water source but provides less mechanical cleansing and may dry skin with frequent use.

If you buy it

Use as directed for normal hand hygiene; no special storage precautions are needed beyond keeping the pump sealed and the product away from direct heat or sunlight. For frequent daily users (healthcare workers, food handlers), monitor for skin irritation and discontinue if dermatitis develops; consider alternating with bar soap and moisturizer to maintain skin barrier. Replace the container before the product expires or if the foam consistency degrades; unused open containers should not be stored longer than 6 months due to preservative system degradation in aqueous formulations.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Preservative system stability and microbial growth

Aqueous hand sanitizer formulations are susceptible to bacterial and fungal contamination if the preservative system (typically parabens or phenoxyethanol) degrades or is insufficient. No published testing of this specific product for preservative efficacy is available; risk increases if containers are opened, refilled, or stored in warm/humid environments beyond shelf life.

Possible

Skin irritation and allergic sensitization from fragrances or preservatives

Dial Professional foam typically contains fragrance compounds and preservatives that may trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions with frequent use, particularly in sensitive populations or healthcare workers with damaged skin barriers. No specific allergen labeling beyond standard Safety Data Sheet disclosure is provided by the brand; individual sensitivity varies widely.

None known

Ethyl alcohol inhalation during use

The aqueous formulation of this product minimizes volatile alcohol vapors compared to pure ethanol gels, reducing inhalation risk in well-ventilated spaces. No documented cases of adverse inhalation effects specific to Dial Professional foam are on record, and the product is designed for safe occupational use.

None known

Heavy metal contamination in colorants or additives

Hand sanitizers are not regulated as cosmetics and typically contain minimal colorants or pigments compared to body care products. No recalls or testing reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Dial Professional foam are available; the risk is theoretical and dependent on supplier quality control for raw materials.

None known

Methanol or isopropanol contamination

Dial Professional is not among the FDA-recalled hand sanitizer products due to methanol or isopropanol substitution; however, no independent third-party testing of this specific SKU for methanol purity has been published. Regulatory oversight assumes manufacturer compliance with alcohol sourcing standards.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Hand Sanitizer

Hand Wash Natural Seventh Generation

Seventh Generation

Hand Wash Natural Seventh Generation

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; MADE SAFE certification and plant-based formula reduce PFAS risk significantly.

MADE SAFEEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Hydrating Antibacterial Hand Mist

Seventh Generation

Hydrating Antibacterial Hand Mist

Water-based cosmetic spray (alcohol, water, plant extracts, preservatives)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower-concern choice; hand mist format and brand transparency reduce PFAS risk, though no dedicated lab testing published.

MADE SAFELeaping Bunny

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

The Honest Company SANI SPRAY-2OZ-GRAPEFRUIT

Honest Company

The Honest Company SANI SPRAY-2OZ-GRAPEFRUIT

Water-based formula (spray disinfectant)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern buy; transparent brand with third-party backing on PFAS.

Made Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More hand sanitizer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.